The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part I: Static Stability and Eddy Scale
Abstract
In this paper, a simplified moist general circulation model is developed and used to study changes in the atmospheric general circulation as the water vapor content of the atmosphere is altered. The key elements of the model physics are gray radiative transfer, in which water vapor and other constituents have no effect on radiative fluxes, a simple diffusive boundary layer with prognostic depth, and a mixed layer aquaplanet surface boundary condition. This GCM can be integrated stably without a convection parameterization, with large-scale condensation only, and this study focuses on this simplest version of the model. These simplifications provide a useful framework in which to focus on the interplay between latent heat release and large-scale dynamics. In this paper, the authors study the role of moisture in determining the tropospheric static stability and midlatitude eddy scale. In a companion paper, the effects of moisture on energy transports by baroclinic eddies are discussed. The authors vary a parameter in the Clausius–Clapeyron relation to control the amount of water in the atmosphere, and consider circulations ranging from the dry limit to 10 times a control value. The typical length scale of midlatitude eddies is found to be remarkably insensitive to the amount of moisture in the atmosphere in this model. The Rhines scale evaluated at the latitude of the maximum eddy kinetic energy fits the model results for the eddy scale well. Moist convection is important in determining the extratropical lapse rate, and the dry stability is significantly increased with increased moisture content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane
Rhines, P. B. (1975) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112075001504 · Cited by 1,177
Cited by
Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming
Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A., & Reichler, T. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl028443 · Cited by 1,219
Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M. W., & Zhao, M. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli2146.1 · Cited by 667
Self-citationStorm track processes and the opposing influences of climate change
Shaw, T. A., Baldwin, M., Barnes, E. A., Caballero, R., Garfinkel, C. I., Hwang, Y.-T., Li, C., O'Gorman, P. A., Rivière, G., Simpson, I. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2783 · Cited by 615
The Gap between Simulation and Understanding in Climate Modeling
Held, I. M. (2005) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-86-11-1609 · Cited by 538
Self-citationO'Gorman, P. A., & Dwyer, J. G. (2018) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2018ms001351 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Frierson, D. M. W., Held, I. M., & Zurita-Gotor, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2548-2566
- ISSN
- 0022-4928 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0469
- OpenAlex
- W2055478960
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part I: Static Stability and Eddy Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jas3753.1
- The paper
- Frierson, D. M. W., Held, I. M., & Zurita-Gotor, P. (2006). A Gray-Radiation Aquaplanet Moist GCM. Part I: Static Stability and Eddy Scale. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3753.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.