The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Strength and Delay of Climatic Interactions: The Ambiguities of Cross Correlation and a Novel Measure Based on Graphical Models
Abstract
Lagged cross-correlation and regression analysis are commonly used to gain insights into interaction mechanisms between climatological processes, in particular to assess time delays and to quantify the strength of a mechanism. Exemplified on temperature anomalies in Europe and the tropical Pacific and Atlantic, the authors study lagged correlation and regressions analytically for a simple model system. A strong dependence on the influence of serial dependencies or autocorrelation is demonstrated, which can lead to misleading conclusions about time delays and also obscures a quantification of the interaction mechanism. To overcome these possible artifacts, the authors propose a two-step procedure based on the concept of graphical models recently introduced to climate research. In the first step, graphical models are used to detect the existence of (Granger) causal interactions that determine the time delays of a mechanism. In the second step, a certain partial correlation and a regression measure are introduced that allow one to specifically quantify the strength of an interaction mechanism in a well interpretable way that enables the exclusion of misleading effects of serial correlation as well as more general dependencies. The potential of the approach to quantify interactions between two and more processes is demonstrated by investigating teleconnections of ENSO and the mechanism of the Walker circulation. The article is intended to serve as a guideline to interpret lagged correlations and regressions in the presence of autocorrelation and introduces a powerful approach to analyze time delays and the strength of an interaction mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Essays in Econometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.002 · Cited by 4,762
Enfield, D. B., & Mayer, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/96jc03296 · Cited by 857
The cause of the fragile relationship between the Pacific El Nino and the Atlantic Nino.
Chang, P., Fang, Y., Saravanan, R., Ji, L., & Seidel, H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05053 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences
Runge, J., Bathiany, S., Bollt, E., Camps-Valls, G., Coumou, D., Deyle, E., Glymour, C., Kretschmer, M., Mahecha, M. D., Muñoz-Marí, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10105-3 · Cited by 984
Self-citationDetecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets
Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S., & Sejdinovic, D. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4996 · Cited by 979
Self-citationCausal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation
Runge, J. (2018) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.5025050 · Cited by 422
Self-citationUnraveling the cause-effect relation between time series
Liang, X. S. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.90.052150 · Cited by 409
Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems
Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., Donges, J. F., Hlinka, J., Jajcay, N., Vejmelka, M., Hartman, D., Marwan, N., Paluš, M., & Kurths, J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9502 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., & Kurths, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2014-01-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 720-739
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2127635108
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Strength and Delay of Climatic Interactions: The Ambiguities of Cross Correlation and a Novel Measure Based on Graphical Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00159.1
- The paper
- Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., & Kurths, J. (2014). Quantifying the Strength and Delay of Climatic Interactions: The Ambiguities of Cross Correlation and a Novel Measure Based on Graphical Models. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00159.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.