Cited by 194Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and coastal ecosystems

The Warming of the California Current System: Dynamics and Ecosystem Implications

Di Lorenzo, Emanuele, Miller, Arthur J., Schneider, Niklas, McWilliams, James C.·2005·Journal of Physical Oceanography

Abstract

Long-term changes in the observed temperature and salinity along the southern California coast are studied using a four-dimensional space–time analysis of the 52-yr (1949–2000) California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) hydrography combined with a sensitivity analysis of an eddy-permitting primitive equation ocean model under various forcing scenarios. An overall warming trend of 1.3°C in the ocean surface, a deepening in the depth of the mean thermocline (18 m), and increased stratification between 1950 and 1999 are found to be primarily forced by large-scale decadal fluctuations in surface heat fluxes combined with horizontal advection by the mean currents. After 1998 the surface heat fluxes suggest the beginning of a period of cooling, consistent with colder observed ocean temperatures. Salinity changes are decoupled from temperature and appear to be controlled locally in the coastal ocean by horizontal advection by anomalous currents. A cooling trend of –0.5°C in SST is driven in the ocean model by the 50-yr NCEP wind reanalysis, which contains a positive trend in upwelling-favorable winds along the southern California coast. A net warming trend of +1°C in SST occurs, however, when the effects of observed surface heat fluxes are included as forcing functions in the model. Within 50–100 km of the coast, the ocean model simulations show that increased stratification/deepening of the thermocline associated with the warming reduces the efficiency of coa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jpo-2690.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Lorenzo, E., Miller, A. J., Schneider, N., & McWilliams, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
336-362
ISSN
  • 0022-3670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-0485
OpenAlex
W2000321047
Cited by
194
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Physical Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
California Current System, ocean warming, thermocline deepening, ocean stratification, surface heat flux, coastal upwelling, salinity, nutrient supply, zooplankton decline, mesoscale eddies, wind forcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review