The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The reliability of axis II of DSM-III
Abstract
The reliability of the diagnoses of axis II of DSM-III was examined by measuring the levels of agreement among three psychiatrists who independently examined the same patients in everyday clinical settings. The kappa coefficient levels were lower than those reported from the field trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DSM-III field trials: I. Initial interrater diagnostic reliability
(1979) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.136.6.815 · Cited by 394
Cited by
Personality disorder: the patients psychiatrists dislike
Lewis, G., & Appleby, L. (1988) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.153.1.44 · Cited by 502
Studying the clinician: judgment research and psychological assessment
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3045 · Cited by 444
A Structured Interview for the DSM-III Personality Disorders: A Preliminary Report
Stangl, D. (1985) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790290073008 · Cited by 444
The DSM-III-R Categorical Personality Disorder Diagnoses: A Critique and an Alternative
Widiger, T. A. (1993) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0402_1 · Cited by 206
Arntz, A. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00052-2 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1982-10-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1360-1361
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2417637593
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reliability of axis II of DSM-III. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.139.10.1360
- The paper
- The reliability of axis II of DSM-III. (1982). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.139.10.1360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.