Cited by 4,175Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease

Wilma G. Rosen, Richard C. Mohs, Kenneth L. Davis·1984·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

A new rating instrument, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, was designed specifically to evaluate the severity of cognitive and noncognitive behavioral dysfunctions characteristic of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Item descriptions, administration procedures, and scoring are outlined. Twenty-seven subjects with Alzheimer's disease and 28 normal elderly subjects were rated on 40 items. Twenty-one items with significant intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater reliability (range, .650-.989) and significant Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability (range, .514-1) constitute the final scale. Subjects with Alzheimer's disease had significantly more cognitive and noncognitive dysfunction than the normal elderly subjects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Salzman C, 1972, Kochansky GE
  2. Reisberg B, 1983, The Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS): findings in primary degenerative dementia (PDD). Psychopharmacol Bull 19: 47-SO
  3. Cole MG, 1980, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Gerontology, 2, 46
  4. Mohs RC, 1982, Rosen WG
  5. Corsellis JAN, 1962, Mental Illness and the Aging Brain
  6. Coblentz JM, 1973, Presenile dementia: clinical aspects and evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Arch Neurol 29:299-308
  7. Ajuriaguerra Jd R, 1980, Ciompi L. Berne, Hans Huber
  8. Mayer-Gross W, 1969, Roth M: Clinical Psychiatry
  9. Rosen WG, 1982, Alzheimer's Disease: A Report of Progress in Research. Edited by Corkin 5, Davis KL, Growdon JH, et al.
  10. Goodglass H, 1972, Kaplan E: The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders
  11. Thorndike EL, 1944, Lorge I: The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words
  12. Wells CE, 1977, FA Davis
  13. Guilford JP, 1978, Fruchter B: Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education
  14. Davis KL, 1982, Psychopharmacol Bull, 18, 193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,175

Metadata

Authors
Rosen, W. G., Mohs, R. C., & Davis, K. L.
Affiliations
James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1984-11-01
Volume
141
Issue
11
Pages
1356-1364
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1953027527
Cited by
4,175
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 165 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 157 · 2013: 160 · 2012: 141
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, rating scale development, cognitive impairment, behavioral dysfunction, disease severity assessment, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, elderly subjects
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review