Cited by 89

Substance use in borderline personality disorder

·1990·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The authors investigated the prevalence of substance abuse in 137 inpatients with DSM-III borderline personality disorder. Ninety-two (67%) of these patients were given DSM-III substance use disorder diagnosis. The most frequently used substances were alcohol and sedative-hypnotics. When substance abuse was not used as a diagnostic criterion for borderline personality disorder, 32 (23%) of the 137 patients no longer met borderline criteria. These patients differed significantly from the rest of the patients in severity and course of illness. These data suggest that there might be a subgroup of borderline patients for whom substance use plays a primary role in the development of borderline psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.147.8.1002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among individuals receiving treatment for BPD, between 21% and 67% also meet criteria for SUDs.

    “In fact, studies indicate that among individuals receiving treatment for BPD, between 21% and 67% also meet criteria for SUDs (Dulit, Fyer, Haas, Sullivan & Frances, 1990).”

    From Transdiagnostic applications of DBT for adolescents and adults (2015) · cites this paper as Dulit, Fyer, Haas, Sullivan & Frances, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1990-08-01
Volume
147
Issue
8
Pages
1002-1007
ISSN
  • 0002-953X
  • 1535-7228
Cited by
89
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review