Cited by 271Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A pilot study of the DBT coach: an interactive mobile phone application for individuals with borderline personality disorder and substance use disorder

Rizvi, Shireen L., Dimeff, Linda A., Skutch, Julie, Carroll, David, Linehan, Marsha M.·2011·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has received strong empirical support and is practiced widely as a treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and BPD with comorbid substance use disorders (BPD-SUD). Therapeutic success in DBT requires that individuals generalize newly acquired skills to their natural environment. However, there have been only a limited number of options available to achieve this end. The primary goal of this research was to develop and test the feasibility of the DBT Coach, a software application for a smartphone, designed specifically to enhance generalization of a specific DBT skill (opposite action) among individuals with BPD-SUD. We conducted a quasiexperimental study in which 22 individuals who were enrolled in DBT treatment programs received a smartphone with the DBT Coach for 10 to 14 days and were instructed to use it as needed. Participants used the DBT Coach an average of nearly 15 times and gave high ratings of helpfulness and usability. Results indicate that both emotion intensity and urges to use substances significantly decreased within each coaching session. Furthermore, over the trial period, participants reported a decrease in depression and general distress. Mobile technology offering in vivo skills coaching may be a useful tool for reducing urges to use substances and engage in other maladaptive behavior by directly teaching and coaching in alternative, adaptive coping behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.003

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizvi, S. L., Dimeff, L. A., Skutch, J., Carroll, D., & Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The New School (US)
Corresponding author
Rizvi, Shireen L.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
589-600
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129420549
Cited by
271
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R43DA0262440-01, R43DA026244)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, substance use disorders, mobile application, skill generalization, emotional intensity, depression, distress, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Software, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review