Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit?

·1994·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of neuropsychological functioning in schizophrenia so as to evaluate hypotheses of lateralized or differential cognitive impairment in this disorder. Furthermore, the study sought to address the potentially confounding factors of medication side effects and relevant demographic variables such as age, education, gender, and handedness. METHOD: The neuropsychological functioning of 28 schizophrenic patients whose medication had been withdrawn for research purposes and 15 demographically matched normal subjects was evaluated. A comprehensive battery of tasks was used to determine whether performance patterns of schizophrenic patients were consistent with models of lateralized or localized neuropsychological impairment in schizophrenia. To facilitate comparison with results of other studies, several analytic strategies were used, including comparisons of group performance on individual tests, composite function scores, and evaluation of performance based on "clinical" criteria of impairment. RESULTS: In contrast to the normal subjects, the schizophrenic patients displayed impairment across measures of motor, sensory, and perceptual functioning, verbal and nonverbal memory, and indexes of frontal lobe functioning. This pattern of generalized dysfunction was evident regardless of the method of analysis used to assess performance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings fail to support conjectures regarding differential neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. However, the psychometric limitations of currently available neuropsychological measures may obscure the finding of differential impairment and must be considered in interpreting the results of this study as well as those of any investigation using such instruments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.151.1.40

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
151
Issue
1
Pages
40-48
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2259973310
Cited by
231
References
2
FWCI
11.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.151.1.40
The paper
The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit? (1994). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.1.40

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.