The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of neuropsychological functioning in schizophrenia so as to evaluate hypotheses of lateralized or differential cognitive impairment in this disorder. Furthermore, the study sought to address the potentially confounding factors of medication side effects and relevant demographic variables such as age, education, gender, and handedness. METHOD: The neuropsychological functioning of 28 schizophrenic patients whose medication had been withdrawn for research purposes and 15 demographically matched normal subjects was evaluated. A comprehensive battery of tasks was used to determine whether performance patterns of schizophrenic patients were consistent with models of lateralized or localized neuropsychological impairment in schizophrenia. To facilitate comparison with results of other studies, several analytic strategies were used, including comparisons of group performance on individual tests, composite function scores, and evaluation of performance based on "clinical" criteria of impairment. RESULTS: In contrast to the normal subjects, the schizophrenic patients displayed impairment across measures of motor, sensory, and perceptual functioning, verbal and nonverbal memory, and indexes of frontal lobe functioning. This pattern of generalized dysfunction was evident regardless of the method of analysis used to assess performance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings fail to support conjectures regarding differential neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. However, the psychometric limitations of currently available neuropsychological measures may obscure the finding of differential impairment and must be considered in interpreting the results of this study as well as those of any investigation using such instruments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions
Robinson, A. L., Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R. A., & Stilson, D. W. (1980) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.48.5.605 · Cited by 491
Cited by
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
The neuropathology of schizophrenia
Harrison, P. J. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.4.593 · Cited by 1,677
Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review.
Mesholam-Gately, R. I., Giuliano, A. J., Goff, K. P., Faraone, S. V., & Seidman, L. J. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0014708 · Cited by 1,130
Working memory in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
Forbes, N. F., Carrick, L. A., McIntosh, A. M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291708004558 · Cited by 550
The primacy of cognition in schizophrenia
Heinrichs, R. W. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.3.229 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-48
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2259973310
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ajp.151.1.40
- The paper
- The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit? (1994). American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.1.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.