Cited by 141Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Feeling unreal: cognitive processes in depersonalization

Guralnik, Orna, Schmeidler, James, Simeon, Daphne·2000·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depersonalization disorder is characterized by a detachment from one's sense of self and one's surroundings that leads to considerable distress and impairment yet an intact testing of reality. Depersonalized individuals often report difficulties in perception, concentration, and memory; however, data on their cognitive profiles are lacking. METHOD: Fifteen patients with depersonalization disorder were compared to 15 matched normal comparison subjects on a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that assessed cognitive function. RESULTS: The subjects with depersonalization disorder showed a distinct cognitive profile. They performed significantly worse than the comparison subjects on certain measures of attention, short-term visual and verbal memory, and spatial reasoning within the context of comparable intellectual abilities. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose that depersonalization involves alterations in the attentional and perceptual systems, specifically in the ability to effortfully control the focus of attention. These early encoding deficits are hypothesized to have a deleterious effect on the short-term memory system; they manifest as deficits in the ability to take in new information but not in the ability to conceptualize and manipulate previously encoded information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.157.1.103

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guralnik, O., Schmeidler, J., & Simeon, D.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
103-109
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2011303369
Cited by
141
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-55582, R29MH055582)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
depersonalization disorder, cognitive profile, attention, short-term memory, visual memory, verbal memory, spatial reasoning, perceptual disorders, self-awareness, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Depersonalization, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review