Cited by 23Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMemory Processes and InfluencesChild Abuse and Trauma

Betrayal trauma theory of dissociative experiences: stroop and directed forgetting findings

GIESBRECHT, TIMO, MERCKELBACH, HARALD·2009·The American Journal of Psychology

Abstract

According to betrayal trauma theory, many survivors of childhood sexual abuse learn to compartmentalize (i.e., dissociate) their traumatic experiences from conscious awareness by dividing attention. This theory predicts that those who dissociate extensively should be at an advantage during dual tasks. Using a modified Stroop task in Experiment 1 and a direct forgetting task in Experiment 2, we tried to replicate Freyd and colleagues’ finding that high-dissociative people perform better under dual task conditions. However, in Experiment 1 we found that, relative to low-dissociative people, high-dissociative people exhibit a slowing of their Stroop reaction times that is independent of valence and attentional context. In Experiment 2, performance on a directed forgetting task was found to be unrelated to dissociation. Our 2 studies provide no evidence for the betrayal trauma theory, nor do they support other theories assuming that dissociation is the manifestation of an automatic defense mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/27784407

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GIESBRECHT, T., & MERCKELBACH, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
The American Journal of Psychology
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
337-348
ISSN
  • 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8298
OpenAlex
W2256875592
Cited by
23
References
47
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
betrayal trauma theory, dissociation, child sexual abuse, compartmentalization, dual-task performance, Stroop task, directed forgetting, reaction time, trauma survivors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Awareness, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Color Perception, Defense Mechanisms, Discrimination, Psychological, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Theory, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Semantics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review