The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Job Performance Deficits Due to Depression
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This study assessed the relationship between depression severity and job performance among employed primary care patients. Method: In a 2001–2004 longitudinal observational study of depression’s affect on work productivity, 286 patients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia were compared to 93 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, a condition associated with work disability, and 193 depression-free healthy control subjects. Participants were employed at least 15 hours per week, did not plan to stop working, and had no major medical comorbidities. Measures at baseline, six, 12, and 18 months included the Work Limitations Questionnaire for work outcomes, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression. Results: At baseline and each follow-up, the depression group had significantly greater deficits in managing mental-interpersonal, time, and output tasks, as measured by the Work Limitations Questionnaire: The rheumatoid arthritis group’s deficits in managing physical job demands surpassed those of either the depression or comparison groups. Improvements in job performance were predicted by symptom severity. However, the job performance of even the “clinically improved” subset of depressed patients remained consistently worse than the control groups. Conclusions: Multiple dimensions of job performance are impaired by depression. This impact persisted after symptoms have improved. Efforts to reduce work-impairment secondary to depression are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Current evidence supports a putative mediational role of cognitive dysfunction in psychosocial functioning, notably workforce productivity [45, 46].”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., Rush, A. J., Walters, E. E., & Wang, P. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095 · Cited by 7,988
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Babbie, E. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2068433 · Cited by 6,859
Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
Osmond, M. W., & Dillman, D. A. (1979) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577403 · Cited by 5,023
The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.262.7.914 · Cited by 2,826
Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study
Spitzer, R. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.272.22.1749 · Cited by 2,648
The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031 · Cited by 2,130
Utility of a New Procedure for Diagnosing Mental Disorders in Primary Care: The PRIME-MD 1000 Study
Spitzer, R. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520220043029 · Cited by 1,873
Cost of Lost Productive Work Time Among US Workers With Depression
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3135 · Cited by 1,421
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Depression Guidelines Panel, 1993, Md, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service
- Ware, 1995, Kosinski M
- Greene WH, 1993, Systems of Regression Equations in Econometric Analysis
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028931 · Cited by 2,123
Burnout–Depression Overlap: A Review
Bianchi, R., Schonfeld, I. S., & Laurent, E. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.004 · Cited by 868
Stress, Burnout, Anxiety and Depression among Teachers: A Scoping Review
Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710706 · Cited by 707
Employee Health and Presenteeism: A Systematic Review
Schultz, A. B., & Edington, D. W. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-007-9096-x · Cited by 601
What Does Research Tell Us About Depression, Job Performance, and Work Productivity?
Lerner, D., & Henke, R. M. (2008) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e31816bae50 · Cited by 525
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adler, D. A., McLaughlin, T. J., Rogers, W. H., Chang, H., Lapitsky, L., & Lerner, D.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adler, David A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1569-1576
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- PMC
- PMC4269259
- OpenAlex
- W2115206348
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 34.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Tufts Medical Center
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH072735, R01MH58243, R01MH058243)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-00054, M01RR000054)
- NIH Clinical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- depression, employee performance, labor productivity, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, rheumatoid arthritis, work disability, symptom severity, primary care patients, Work Limitations Questionnaire, PHQ-9
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Efficiency, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Occupations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Task Performance and Analysis, United States, Work Capacity Evaluation, Prevalence, Dysthymic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review