CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 152Eating Disorders and BehaviorsHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived Coercion and Change in Perceived Need for Admission in Patients Hospitalized for Eating Disorders

Guarda, Angela S., Pinto, Angela Marinilli, Coughlin, Janelle W., Hussain, Shahana, Haug, Nancy A., Heinberg, Leslie J.·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.108
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ambivalence toward treatment is characteristic of eating disorders, and patients are often admitted to inpatient programs under pressure from clinicians, family, friends, educators, or employers. This study evaluated patient perceptions of the admissions process and perceived need for hospitalization and assessed whether these perceptions remain stable in the short term. METHOD: A total of 139 patients with eating disorders completed a 13-item self-report scale on the admission experience when they were admitted to a behavioral inpatient specialty program and again 2 weeks into their hospitalization. RESULTS: Patients with anorexia nervosa reported higher levels of perceived coercion and pressure and a lower sense of procedural justice than did those with bulimia. Patients under 18 (N=35) reported more perceived coercion than did adult patients (N=104), and a trend was noted for them to disagree that they needed hospitalization. Perceptions of coercion, of pressure by others toward hospitalization, and of procedural justice were stable in the short term. However, of the 46 patients (30 of them adults) who initially did not endorse needing admission, 20 patients (17 of them adults) changed their minds by 2 weeks into hospitalization and agreed that they needed hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients with eating disorders who denied a need for treatment on admission converted to acknowledging that they needed to be admitted within 2 weeks of hospitalization. Since treatment avoidance is associated with poor outcome, these findings suggest a need for studies assessing the long-term outcome and ethics of pressuring patients with eating disorders into treatment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.108

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rathner G, 1998, Treating Eating Disorders: Ethical, Legal, and Personal Issues, 179
  2. Garner CM, 1991, Fla
  3. First MB, 1997, Gibbon M

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Guarda, A. S., Pinto, A. M., Coughlin, J. W., Hussain, S., Haug, N. A., & Heinberg, L. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2007-01
Volume
164
Issue
1
Pages
108-114
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.108
OpenAlex
W2073096420
Cited by
152
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, perceived coercion, hospitalization, procedural justice, treatment pressure, adolescents, treatment avoidance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude to Health, Coercion, Female, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review