The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Syndromic Validity of Apathy in Alzheimer’s Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study examined the usefulness and clinical correlates of specific diagnostic criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease. Whereas apathy is a frequent behavioral change in patients with Alzheimer's disease, the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria may explain the wide discrepancies in estimates of the frequency and demographic and clinical correlates of apathy. METHOD: A consecutive series of 319 patients who met the criteria for probable Alzheimer's disease established by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association, 117 patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for depression without dementia, and 36 healthy individuals were assessed with a structured psychiatric interview. On the basis of modified Marin's criteria for apathy, they were classified into groups with or without apathy. RESULTS: Apathy was diagnosed in 37% of the 319 Alzheimer's disease patients, compared to none of the healthy comparison subjects. In 24% of the Alzheimer's disease sample, apathy coexisted with either dysthymic disorder or major depressive disorder, whereas 13% had apathy without depression. Apathy was diagnosed in 32% of the depressed nondemented patients, mostly in those with major depressive disorder. Apathy in Alzheimer's disease was significantly associated with severe impairments in activities of daily living and cognitive functions, older age, and poor awareness of behavioral and cognitive changes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides partial validation of specific clinical criteria for apathy in Alzheimer's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Cited by
Neuroscience of apathy and anhedonia: a transdiagnostic approach
Husain, M., & Roiser, J. P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0029-9 · Cited by 640
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005 · Cited by 596
Robert, P. H., Clairet, S., Benoit, M., Koutaich, J., Bertogliati, C., Tible, O., Caci, H., Borg, M., Brocker, P., & Bedoucha, P. (2002) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.755 · Cited by 405
The nosological position of apathy in clinical practice
Starkstein, S. E., & Leentjens, A. F. G. (2008) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.136895 · Cited by 371
Self-citationvan Reekum, R., Stuss, D. T., & Ostrander, L. (2005) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.17.1.7 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Starkstein, S. E., Petracca, G., Chemerinski, E., & Kremer, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 872-877
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2128711456
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Syndromic Validity of Apathy in Alzheimer’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.872
- The paper
- Starkstein, S. E., Petracca, G., Chemerinski, E., & Kremer, J. (2001). Syndromic Validity of Apathy in Alzheimer’s Disease. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.