The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can a Valid Diagnosis of Disruptive Behavior Disorder Be Made in Preschool Children?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Disruptive behavior problems are the most common reason preschool children come to mental health clinics. Yet consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of such problems in young children is lacking. DSM-IV is the most widely used nosologic system for children, but the majority of the validation sample consisted of school-age children and adolescents. It is debatable whether behavioral problems in young children should be considered within a diagnostic framework at all, since normative behavioral disruption occurs during the preschool period. Developing valid methods for assessing child behavior problems across development is critical for etiologic and prevention research. METHOD: The authors compare different approaches to conceptualizing disruptive behavior in young children, review evidence for the construct validity of DSM-based oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in preschool children, and outline an agenda for future research. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Typical and atypical behavior problems can be differentiated in preschool children, and the DSM framework, with some modification to address the child's developmental level, appears to be a valid method for identifying preschool children with disruptive behavior that is impairing. Empirical investigation is needed to standardize modification of existing assessment tools so that they can be used with preschool children and to develop more clinically sensitive methods for using observational data in assessment and for establishing the child's level of development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The development of aggressive behaviour during childhood: What have we learned in the past century?
Tremblay, R. E. (2000) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/016502500383232 · Cited by 842
Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005118000977 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Cited by
Egger, H. L., & Angold, A. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01618.x · Cited by 1,575
Test-retest reliability of the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA)
EGGER, H. L., ERKANLI, A., KEELER, G., POTTS, E., WALTER, B. K., & ANGOLD, A. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000205705.71194.b8 · Cited by 589
Research Review: DSM‐V conduct disorder: research needs for an evidence base
Moffitt, T. E., order, A. I. A., Arseneault, L., Jaffee, S. R., Kim‐Cohen, J., Koenen, K. C., Odgers, C. L., Slutske, W. S., & Viding, E. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01823.x · Cited by 447
Nakao (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.10.003 · Cited by 213
Validity of DSM-IV Conduct Disorder in 4½–5-Year-Old Children: A Longitudinal Epidemiological Study
Kim-Cohen, J., Arseneault, L., Caspi, A., Tomás, M. P., Taylor, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1108 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 351-358
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2106403525
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can a Valid Diagnosis of Disruptive Behavior Disorder Be Made in Preschool Children? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.351
- The paper
- Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2002). Can a Valid Diagnosis of Disruptive Behavior Disorder Be Made in Preschool Children? American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.