The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elevated Risk of Tobacco Dependence Among Offspring of Mothers Who Smoked During Pregnancy: A 30-Year Prospective Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to investigate whether maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of nicotine dependence among adult offspring. METHOD: Prospective data from two samples of offspring in the National Collaborative Perinatal Project, a long-term prospective investigation from pregnancy through adulthood, were combined (N=1,248). Maternal smoking during pregnancy was assessed during each prenatal visit. Offspring smoking behavior and lifetime risk of nicotine dependence were obtained by structured interview with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule; the mean age of the offspring at the time of interview was 29 years. RESULTS: Offspring whose mothers reported smoking a pack or more of cigarettes during their pregnancy were significantly more likely to meet DSM criteria for lifetime tobacco dependence than offspring of mothers who reported that they never smoked during pregnancy. The odds of progressing from smoking to nicotine dependence were almost twice as great for offspring whose mothers smoked heavily during pregnancy. These significant differences remained after adjustments for participants' gender and age and maternal socioeconomic status and age at pregnancy. Results were comparable for men and women. The findings were specific for tobacco dependence; odds of marijuana dependence were not significantly elevated among the offspring of tobacco smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Offspring of mothers who smoked a pack or more of cigarettes during pregnancy are at elevated risk of developing nicotine dependence but not marijuana dependence as adults. Maternal smoking during pregnancy is a risk factor for subsequent nicotine dependence among offspring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Navarro, H. A., Seidler, F. J., Schwartz, R. D., Baker, F. E., Dobbins, S. S., & Slotkin, T. A. (1989) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(89)90146-9 · Cited by 171
Cited by
How can drug addiction help us understand obesity?
Volkow, N. D., & Wise, R. A. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1452 · Cited by 1,089
The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain
Dwyer, J. B., McQuown, S. C., & Leslie, F. M. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.003 · Cited by 559
Huizink, A. C., & Mulder, E. J. H. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.005 · Cited by 468
Nicotine and brain development
Dwyer, J. B., Broide, R. S., & Leslie, F. M. (2008) · Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews · doi:10.1002/bdrc.20118 · Cited by 256
Maternal tobacco smoking, nicotine replacement and neurobehavioural development
Pauly, J. R., & Slotkin, T. A. (2008) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00852.x · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Buka, S. L., Shenassa, E. D., & Niaura, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1978-1984
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2163927333
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.