Cited by 197Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Comorbidity of Axis I and Axis II Disorders in Patients Who Attempted Suicide

Hawton, Keith, Houston, Kelly, Haw, Camilla, Townsend, Ellen, Harriss, Louise·2003·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors compared the characteristics of suicide attempters with and without comorbid psychiatric and personality disorders to identify factors that explain the high suicide risk associated with psychiatric comorbidity. Method A representative group of 111 patients who had attempted suicide (72 female and 39 male) was assessed for psychiatric and personality disorders according to ICD-10 criteria. The characteristics of patients with both types of disorder were compared with those of patients without comorbid disorders. A semistructured interview schedule and standardized questionnaires were used to investigate patients' background characteristics, the circumstances of the suicide attempts, psychological characteristics, and outcome after 12-20 months. Results Comorbidity of psychiatric and personality disorders was present in 49 patients (44%). More patients with comorbid disorders had made previous suicide attempts (N=41 [84%] versus N=28 [45%]) and repeated attempts during the follow-up period (N=25 [51%] versus N=9 [15%]). Differences in precipitants and motives for the index episode were also found: patients with comorbid disorders were more depressed and hopeless, reported more episodes of aggression, were more impulsive, and had lower self-esteem and poorer problem-solving skills. Differences in self-esteem and problem-solving skills distinguished between the groups in a stepwise discriminant function analysis. More of the patients with comorbid disorders…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1494

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawton, K., Houston, K., Haw, C., Townsend, E., & Harriss, L.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
160
Issue
8
Pages
1494-1500
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2114281845
Cited by
197
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide attempts, psychiatric comorbidity, personality disorders, suicide risk, depression, hopelessness, impulsivity, self-esteem, problem-solving skills, parental suicide, parental rejection, repeated suicide attempts, suicide motives
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Suicide, Attempted, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review