CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 224Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Dialectical Behavior Therapy Plus Olanzapine for Borderline Personality Disorder

Soler, Joaquim, Pascual, Juan Carlos, Campins, Josefa, Barrachina, Judith, Puigdemont, Dolors, Alvarez, Enrique, Pérez, Victor·2005·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1221
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of dialectical behavior therapy plus olanzapine compared with dialectical behavior therapy plus placebo in patients with borderline personality disorder. METHOD: Sixty patients with borderline personality disorder were included in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. All patients received dialectical behavior therapy and were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine or placebo following a 1-month baseline period. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients completed the 4-month trial. Combined treatment showed an overall improvement in most symptoms studied in both groups. Olanzapine was associated with a statistically significant improvement over placebo in depression, anxiety, and impulsivity/aggressive behavior. The mean dose of olanzapine was 8.83 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: A combined psychotherapeutic plus pharmacological approach appears to lower dropout rates and constitutes an effective treatment for borderline personality disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1221

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barrachina J, Soler J, Campins MJ, Tejero A, Pascual JC, Alvarez E, Zanarini MC, Perez Sola V: Validation of a Spanish version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines—Revised (DIB-R). Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2004; 32:293–298

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 224

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Soler, J., Pascual, J. C., Campins, J., Barrachina, J., Puigdemont, D., Alvarez, E., & Pérez, V.
Affiliations
Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
162
Issue
6
Pages
1221-1224
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1221
OpenAlex
W2149470409
Cited by
224
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, dialectical behavior therapy, olanzapine, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, depression, anxiety, impulsivity, aggression, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Benzodiazepines, Borderline Personality Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Placebos, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review