Cited by 263Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet-Delivered Treatment for Substance Abuse: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computer-delivered interventions have the potential to improve access to quality addiction treatment care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Therapeutic Education System (TES), an Internet-delivered behavioral intervention that includes motivational incentives, as a clinician-extender in the treatment of substance use disorders. METHOD: Adult men and women (N=507) entering 10 outpatient addiction treatment programs were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual (N=252) or treatment as usual plus TES, with the intervention substituting for about 2 hours of standard care per week (N=255). TES consists of 62 computerized interactive modules covering skills for achieving and maintaining abstinence, plus prize-based motivational incentives contingent on abstinence and treatment adherence. Treatment as usual consisted of individual and group counseling at the participating programs. The primary outcome measures were abstinence from drugs and heavy drinking (measured by twice-weekly urine drug screens and self-report) and time to dropout from treatment. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the treatment-as-usual group, those in the TES group had a lower dropout rate (hazard ratio=0.72, 95% CI=0.57, 0.92) and a greater abstinence rate (odds ratio=1.62, 95% CI=1.12, 2.35). This effect was more pronounced among patients who had a positive urine drug or breath alcohol screen at study entry (N=228) (odds ratio=2.18, 95% CI=1.30, 3.68). CONCLUSIONS: Internet-delivered interventions such as TES have the potential to expand access and improve addiction treatment outcomes. Additional research is needed to assess effectiveness in non-specialty clinical settings and to differentiate the effects of the community reinforcement approach and contingency management components of TES.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081055

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012, Results From the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH Series H-44, HHS Publication No (SMA) 12-4713
  2. Budney AJ, 1998, Therapy Manuals for Drug Addiction: A Community Reinforcement Plus Vouchers Approach: Treating Cocaine Addiction
  3. Chaple M, 2013, J Exp Criminol
  4. Knapp WP, 2007, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD003023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, A. N. C., Nunes, E. V., Matthews, A. G., Stitzer, M., Miele, G. M., Polsky, D., Turrigiano, E., Walters, S., McClure, E. A., Kyle, T. L., Wahle, A., Van Veldhuisen, P., Goldman, B., Babcock, D., Stabile, P. Q., Winhusen, T., & Ghitza, U. E.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • From New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York; EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Md.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth; Clinical...
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-06
Volume
171
Issue
6
Pages
683-690
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1963819178
Cited by
263
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u10da013034-15)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10DA013720, U10DA013035, K24DA022412, DA013035, U10-DA013034, U10DA013732, U10DA015815, U10DA020024, U10DA013036, U10DA013714, U10DA015831, DA015831, UG1DA020024)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (L60 MD006644)
  • National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet-delivered treatment, substance use disorders, motivational incentives, abstinence, treatment discontinuation, outpatient addiction treatment, community reinforcement, contingency management, access to addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review