Cited by 89Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Appropriate controls for digital therapeutic clinical trials: A narrative review of control conditions in clinical trials of digital therapeutics (DTx) deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content

Open access
Lutz, Jacqueline, Offidani, Emanuela, Taraboanta, Laura, Lakhan, Shaheen E., Campellone, Timothy R.·2022·Frontiers in Digital Health

Abstract

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software programs that treat a disease or condition. Increasingly, DTx are part of medical care, and in the US healthcare system they are regulated by the FDA as Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). Randomized controlled trials (RCT) remain a key evidence generation step for most DTx. However, developing a unified approach to the design of appropriate control conditions has been a challenge for two main reasons: (1) inheriting control condition definitions from pharmacotherapy and medical device RCT that may not directly apply, and (2) challenges in establishing control conditions for psychosocial interventions that build the core of many DTx. In our critical review we summarize different approaches to control conditions and patient blinding in RCT evaluating DTx with psychosocial, cognitive or behavioral content. We identify control condition choices, ranging from very minimal digital controls to more complex and stringent digital applications that contain aspects of “fake” therapy, general wellness content or games. Our review of RCTs reveals room for improvement in describing and naming control conditions more consistently. We further discuss challenges in defining placebo controls for DTx and ways in which control choices may have a therapeutic effect. While no one-size-fits-all control conditions and study designs will apply to all DTx, we propose points to consider for defining appropriate digital control conditions. At the same time, given the rapid iterative development and optimization of DTx, treatments with low risk profile may be evaluated with minimal digital controls followed by extensive real-world effectiveness trials.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review examines control conditions in randomized controlled trials of software-based digital therapeutics (DTx) with psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content, reviewing 14 trials. It finds inconsistent control nomenclature and descriptions, and proposes considerations for choosing and reporting digital controls based on risk, novelty, and stringency.

Key findings

  • Across 14 reviewed RCTs (sample sizes 80–1149; most 2-arm, two 3-arm), about half used unblinded waitlist or treatment-as-usual (TAU) controls and about half used sham controls; only one trial used an active comparator, and only within a 3-arm RCT that also included TAU.
  • Sham designs varied: replacing core treatment with “fake, but plausible therapies,” delivering general disease-agnostic wellbeing tips, disarming content, or removing disease-specific therapeutic content/features; all reviewed gamified cognitive training or remediation DTx used sham controls.
  • None of the trials reported blinding checks, despite CONSORT recommendations; control nomenclature was inconsistent (sham, placebo, digital control, attention-matched placebo, active control).
  • The authors recommend matching control stringency to risk/novelty, matching app time and instructions, avoiding disease-specific therapeutic content in inactive digital controls, considering three-arm designs, and reporting controls using standardized frameworks such as TIDieR.

Methods

  • Narrative review of DTx RCTs deploying cognitive, behavioral, or psychosocial content; started from the DTx Alliance product list (accessed Jan 2022), selected purely software-based products without additional physical devices and with a primary cognitive or behavioral intervention; 10 products met criteria.
  • Explored phase 2 and 3 RCTs, including FDA registration trials; for multiple RCTs per DTx, focused on the most recent; added additional phase 2/3 trials from companies planning or conducting regulatory submission based on author knowledge and press releases.
  • 14 RCTs were reviewed; no meta-analysis or systematic search was performed.

Limitations

  • Stated: not a systematic review and may not contain all control condition choices; regulatory considerations and the majority of trials are US-centered; DTx risks (technical, treatment selection, missed serious symptoms) need testing.
  • Evident from the text: no included trial reported blinding checks, and control conditions were inconsistently named and often poorly described, limiting comparability.
  • Evident from the text: the small number of trials and reliance on the DTx Alliance list, author awareness, and press releases may introduce selection bias.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fdgth.2022.823977

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 35 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    About half of the reviewed trials used unblinded waitlist or treatment-as-usual (TAU) control groups.

    “We found about half of the trials used unblinded waitlist or treatment-as-usual (TAU) control groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Findingcitation

    Sleepio, another DTx for the treatment of insomnia, created a digital control app that contained no social community feature compared to the active intervention.

    “Similarly, Sleepio, another DTx for the treatment of insomnia, created a digital control app that contained no social community feature compared to the active intervention (33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Espie, 2012, A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated Media-rich web application, Sleep source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Findingcitation

    In some sham controls, certain content and/or features were removed, mainly disease specific therapeutic content (e.g. CBT) or additional disease management features (community features).

    “Finally, certain content and/or features were removed in the control condition, mainly disease specific therapeutic content (e.g. CBT (32, 56)) or additional disease management features (community features (33)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] Boucher, 2020, Immediate and long-term effects of an 8-week digital mental health intervention on adults with poorly managed type 2 diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial, JMIR Res Protoc source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Christensen, 2016, Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Espie, 2012, A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated Media-rich web application, Sleep source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Findingown data

    The other half of reviewed trials deployed different forms of sham controls.

    “The other half deployed different forms of sham controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Findingcitation

    Two DTx that received FDA clearance as SaMD for the adjunctive treatment of opioid use and substance use disorder used TAU or reduced TAU as comparators.

    “Similarly, two DTx that received FDA clearance as SaMD for the adjunctive treatment of opioid use and substance use disorder (8, 46) used TAU or reduced TAU as comparators (see Table 1 for a description of the reduced TAU versus full TAU condition) (8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] Campbell, 2014, Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial, Am J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] Christensen, 2014, Adding an internet-delivered treatment to an efficacious treatment package for opioid dependence, J Consult Clin Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The review of RCTs reveals room for improvement in describing and naming control conditions more consistently.

    “Our review of RCTs reveals room for improvement in describing and naming control conditions more consistently.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Fourteen RCTs were reviewed.

    “Fourteen RCTs were reviewed (Table 1 in the Supplementary Material).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Endeavor trial found that the treatment separated from the control on the primary, objective measure of attention, but not on clinical measures related to ADHD subjective symptoms.

    “The study found that the treatment separated from the control on the primary, objective measure of attention, but not on clinical measures related to ADHD subjective symptoms (27).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Kollins, 2020, A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): a randomised controlled trial, Lancet Digit Heal source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Sham controls either replaced core treatment activities with "fake, but plausible therapies" or delivered general, disease agnostic wellbeing tips.

    “Sham controls either replaced core treatment activities with “fake, but plausible therapies” (33) or they delivered general, disease agnostic wellbeing tips (32, 56).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [33] Espie, 2012, A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated Media-rich web application, Sleep source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] Boucher, 2020, Immediate and long-term effects of an 8-week digital mental health intervention on adults with poorly managed type 2 diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial, JMIR Res Protoc source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Christensen, 2016, Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All reviewed DTx containing gamified cognitive training or remediation interventions chose a form of sham control, with some sham controls looking similar to consumer grade apps or video games.

    “It is noteworthy that all reviewed DTx containing gamified cognitive training or remediation interventions chose a form of sham control, with some sham controls looking similar to consumer grade apps or video games.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Another strategy was to "disarm" certain content, which means removing key aspects hypothesized to drive efficacy.

    “Another strategy was to “disarm” certain content, which means removing key aspects hypothesized to drive efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only one trial deployed an active comparator, and only as part of a 3-arm RCT including a TAU control arm for the main comparison.

    “Only one trial deployed an active comparator and only as part of a 3-arm RCT including a TAU control arm for the main comparison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    TAU was the main comparator arm in a 3-arm RCT of iCBT for Irritable Bowel Syndrome, the data from which was used to support the FDA clearance of Parallel.

    “TAU was the main comparator arm in a 3-arm RCT of iCBT for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), the data from which was used to support the FDA clearance of Parallel (10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Everitt, 2015, Assessing cognitive behavioural therapy in irritable bowel (ACTIB): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of therapist delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and web-based self-management in irritable, BMJ Open source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Authors did not regularly discuss control design choices such as why certain features were removed or disarmed.

    “Authors did not regularly discuss control design choices such as why certain features were removed or disarmed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A wellbeing program (The Health and Well-Being Program) included as a control condition for obsessive compulsive disorder was described as an "active intervention", while similar "general health and well-being educational content" was called a placebo control for a RCT for diabetes mellitus, type 2.

    “For example, a wellbeing program (The Health and Well-Being Program) included as a control condition for obsessive compulsive disorder was described as an “active intervention” (61), while similar “general health and well-being educational content” was called a placebo control for a RCT for diabetes mellitus, type 2 (32).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [61]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] Boucher, 2020, Immediate and long-term effects of an 8-week digital mental health intervention on adults with poorly managed type 2 diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial, JMIR Res Protoc source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    None of the reviewed trials report blinding checks, which are recommended by trial reporting standards (CONSORT).

    “Surprisingly, none of the trials report blinding checks, which are recommended by trial reporting standards (Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials, CONSORT (57)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Altman, 2001, The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration, Artic Ann Intern Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the schizophrenia DTx trial, the digital control improved some of the secondary outcomes and did not perform significantly worse than the investigational treatment.

    “it is notable that the digital control improved some of the secondary outcomes and did not perform significantly worse than the investigational treatment (59).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A unified approach to designing appropriate control conditions for DTx RCTs has been a challenge because establishing control conditions for psychosocial interventions that build the core of many DTx is challenging.

    “and (2) challenges in establishing control conditions for psychosocial interventions that build the core of many DTx.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The above examples highlight the complexity of designing control conditions for DTx and the challenge of designing inactive control conditions while keeping enough credible content for participant blinding.

    “The above examples highlight the complexity of designing control conditions for DTx as well as the challenge of designing inactive control conditions while keeping enough credible content for participants blinding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A control condition that establishes a structured and supportive therapeutic alliance already contains major efficacy factors of psychotherapy and will therefore not be inactive.

    “Thus, a control condition which establishes structured and supportive therapeutic alliance already contains major efficacy factors of psychotherapy and will therefore not be inactive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In the SHUTi trial, the investigational treatment and control condition differ on at least core CBT content and sleep time suggestions, and the difference between them might be based on core CBT content, the concrete sleep time suggestions, or both.

    “Therefore the investigational treatment and control condition differ on at least these two aspects, and thus the difference between them might be based on core CBT content, the concrete sleep time suggestions, or both (56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Christensen, 2016, Effectiveness of an online insomnia program (SHUTi) for prevention of depressive episodes (the GoodNight Study): a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The use of the term "active control" for off-the-shelf games in the Posit Science trial is likely applying a more academic nomenclature of active controls that is not in line with the FDA definition where active controls are interventions with known therapeutic effects.

    “The use of active control here is likely applying a more academic nomenclature of active controls which is not in line with the FDA definition where active controls are interventions with known therapeutic effects (42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trying to design placebo therapies with low or no active ingredients often results in therapies with low face-validity and the risk of unblinding participants to study assignment.

    “On the flip side, trying to design placebo therapies with low or no active ingredients often result in therapies with low face-validity and the risk to unblind all or at least some participants to study assignment (22).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Enck, 2019, Placebo effects in psychotherapy: a framework, Front Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    By analyzing which aspects of digital interventions were changed or removed in a digital control, one can draw conclusions about which features were considered to have the highest likelihood for being efficacious in the DTx.

    “It is interesting to note that by analyzing which aspects of digital interventions were changed or removed in a digital control, we can draw conclusions about which features were considered to have the highest likelihood for being efficacious in the DTx.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Studies employing waitlist or no intervention control groups are not blinded, and thus do not control for the expectation of benefit.

    “However, studies employing these control groups are not blinded, and thus do not control for the expectation of benefit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    RCTs are considered the "gold standard" to evaluate therapeutic interventions.

    “RCTs are considered the “gold standard” to evaluate therapeutic interventions (13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] D’Agostino, 1995, Measuring effectiveness: what to expect without a randomized control group, Med Care

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Challenges of selecting appropriate control conditions for DTx stem from the breadth of underlying treatment principles and mechanisms, known challenges in designing placebo controls for psychological treatments, and the fact that no physical device can aid in blinding participants.

    “In summary, challenges of selecting appropriate control conditions for DTx, stem from the breadth of underlying treatment principles and mechanisms, sometimes interacting in a complex nature, known challenges in designing placebo controls for psychological treatments, and the fact that no physical device can aid in the blinding of participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In software-only SaMD interventions, no physical device can aid in blinding participants.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    FDA guidelines applicable for SaMD follow typical medical device settings, which usually contain a hardware component, without concrete recommendations for control conditions in software-only SaMD interventions.

    “Taken together, the FDA guidelines applicable for SaMD follow typical medical device settings, which usually contain a hardware component, without concrete recommendations for control conditions in software only SaMD interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is unlikely that there will ever be a one-size-fits-all approach to control condition design for DTx.

    “Given the breadth of DTx content and applications, it is unlikely that there will ever be a one-size-fits-all approach to control condition design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The effect in the schizophrenia DTx trial may be due to at least partially ineffective blinding in the group receiving the minimal control condition or to regular engagement with a structured digital experience resembling behavioral activation.

    “This effect may be due to at least partially ineffective blinding in the group receiving the minimal control condition or they could be related to regular engagement with a structured digital experience, which resembles specific components discussed in psychotherapy, such as behavioral activation, discussed above.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Real-world and pragmatic study approaches are gaining popularity, and have been recommended to support regulatory decisions (e.g. The 21st Century Cures Act).

    “Indeed, real-world and pragmatic study approaches are gaining popularity, and have been recommended to support regulatory decisions (e.g. The 21st Century Cures Act) (65).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The minimal control level applies to drug trials as much as to DTx.

    “This applies to drug trials as much as to DTx.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Based on results from research into the placebo effect, such trial specifications may bias RCTs in different ways and affect comparability between trials.

    “Based on results from research into the placebo effect, such trial specifications may bias RCTs in different ways (62) and affect comparability between trials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Kaptchuk, 2001, The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf?, J Clin Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The names used for control conditions may not accurately describe the actual control designs, which limits the comparability of results across studies and even across fields.

    “Thus, the names used for control conditions may not accurately describe the actual control designs, which limits the comparability of results across studies and even across fields.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In light of the iterative nature of software development, there has been a call for more innovative real-world data approaches to evidence generation for DTx beyond classical RCTs.

    “Indeed, in light of the iterative nature of software development, there has been a call for more innovative real-world data approaches to evidence generation for DTx beyond classical RCTs (64).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Guo, 2020, Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—a call for innovative evidence generation approaches, npj Digit Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The differing descriptions of similar control conditions may exemplify the "known unknowns" of mechanisms and efficacy factors in DTx and how individual authors judge the efficacy of different features differently or at the very least point to inconsistencies of describing control conditions.

    “This may exemplify the “known unknowns” of mechanisms and efficacy factors in DTx and how individual authors judge the efficacy of different features differently or at the very least point to inconsistencies of describing control conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The review does not constitute a systematic review and may not contain all control condition choices in the field.

    “The review therefore does not constitute a systematic review and may not contain all control condition choices in the field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The regulatory considerations provided and majority of trials in this review are US-centered, and therefore our assessment does not represent or discuss potential differences in regulatory practices beyond the US.

    “Further, the regulatory considerations provided and majority of trials in this review are US-centered, and therefore our assessment does not represent or discuss potential differences in regulatory practices beyond the US.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This review is based on DTx deploying cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial interventions that fulfill the DTx definition, may have attempted to or are attempting FDA clearance, and are presented by the DTx alliance and similar trials based on the authors' awareness of the field.

    “This review is based on DTx deploying cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial interventions that that fulfill the DTx definition, may have attempted to or are attempting FDA clearance, and are presented by the DTx alliance and similar trials based on the authors' awareness of the field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The inconsistency in control condition nomenclature may relate to different definitions of these terms in the literature, for example in the behavioral research literature versus FDA guidance.

    “This may relate to different definitions of these terms in the literature, for example in the behavioral research literature versus FDA guidance (see Definitions Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Relatively more novel interventions may require more stringent controls compared to digital translations of known psychosocial behavioral interventions, such as CBT.

    “In addition, relatively more novel interventions may require more stringent controls compared to digital translations of known psychosocial behavioral interventions, such as CBT (12).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Mohr, 2021, Banbury forum consensus statement on the path forward for digital mental health treatment, Psychiatr Serv source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Whether participants expected two potentially active treatments versus a treatment and placebo control can influence the size of nonspecific effects of the two arms and may affect the number needed to enroll to show a significant difference between the conditions.

    “Whether participants expected two potentially active treatments versus a treatment and placebo control can influence the size of nonspecific effects of the two arms and may affect the number needed to enroll to show a significant difference between the conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In software-only SaMD interventions, no physical device can aid in blinding participants.

    “the fact that no physical device can aid in the blinding of participants”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 14 reviewed RCTs are representative of DTx RCTs deploying psychosocial, cognitive, or behavioral content.

    “Fourteen RCTs were reviewed (Table 1 in the Supplementary Material).”
    “We found about half of the trials used unblinded waitlist or treatment-as-usual (TAU) control groups.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Less stringent control conditions lead to larger measurable treatment effects.

    “with less stringent control conditions leading to larger effect sizes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Waitlist control conditions will control for aspects of natural disease progression and being regularly assessed in a trial.

    “For example, waitlist control conditions will control for aspects of natural disease progression and being regularly assessed in a trial.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    More stringent sham or placebo controls will also contain aspects of a digital control, such as engagement tools, digital disease management tools, such as wellness content or trackers.

    “More stringent sham or placebo controls will also contain aspects of a digital control, such as engagement tools, digital disease management tools, such as wellness content or trackers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DTx are uniquely positioned to collect real-world data, engagement patterns, user reported outcome data, and/or clinically relevant digital phenotypes directly through their software application to assess their real-world engagement and effectiveness.

    “DTx are uniquely positioned to collect real-world data, engagement patterns, user reported outcome data, and/or clinically relevant digital phenotypes directly through their software application to assess their real-world engagement and effectiveness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Waitlist controls may overestimate treatment effects.

    “While waitlist controls may overestimate treatment effects, they may be a viable option as a control condition in large-scale real-world studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DTx risk profiles will in most cases be lower compared to pharmacological interventions.

    “while DTx risk profiles will in most cases be lower compared to pharmacological interventions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are still risks to be considered and studied in DTx, ranging from technical risks, to a risk of a non-adequate treatment selection and the related risk of more general loss of confidence in treatments, or the risks of a DTx failing to detect serious symptoms such as suicidality.

    “there are still risks to be considered and studied in DTx, ranging from technical risks, to a risk of a non-adequate treatment selection and the related risk of more general loss of confidence in treatments, or the risks of a DTx failing to detect serious symptoms such as suicidality.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    RCTs remain a key aspect in evidence generation in DTx, especially those therapeutics seeking regulatory approval.

    “RCTs remain a key aspect in evidence generation in DTx, especially those therapeutics seeking regulatory approval.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DTx generally have a low risk profile and potential to increase access to personalized care.

    “Given the general low risk profile and potential of DTx to increase access to personalized care”
11 of 11

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of blinding may be common where subjects are part of ongoing mental health therapy or when pharmacotherapy blinding designs may not translate to eHealth.

    “The lack of blinding may be common where subjects are part of ongoing mental health therapy or when pharmacotherapy blinding designs may not translate to eHealth [45].”

    From Patient Engagement with Conversational Agents in Health Applications 2016–2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Blinding; Summary of control conditions, page not available) report unblinded treatment-as-usual designs and difficulty with blinding in nonpharmacologic digital therapeutics. The Introduction (Additional control considerations, page not available) explains why a pharmacological-style placebo is difficult to construct for software treatments. The paper does not specifically establish that participants’ ongoing mental health therapy causes a lack of blinding. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are no established guidelines for designing and categorizing control conditions for mHealth RCTs.

    “However, there are no established guidelines for designing and categorizing control conditions for mHealth RCTs15,16”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Julien, 2013, A primer of drug action: A concise nontechnical guide to the actions, uses, and side effects of psychoactive drugs, revised and updated
  2. Asay, The empirical case for the common factors in therapy: quantitative findings, 23
  3. Kollins, 2020, A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): a randomised controlled trial, Lancet Digit Heal, 2, e168, 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30017-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2013, Design considerations for pivotal clinical investigations for medical devices
  5. 2016, De novo summary (DEN160018)
  6. 2021, Otsuka, Click Therapeutics Kick off Decentralized Pivotal Trial for Depression Digital Therapeutics |
  7. 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutz, J., Offidani, E., Taraboanta, L., Lakhan, S. E., & Campellone, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Click Therapeutics, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lakhan, Shaheen E.
Venue
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2022-08-18
Volume
4
Pages
823977-823977
ISSN
2673-253X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292478611
Cited by
89
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
digital therapeutics, control conditions, placebo comparison, randomized controlled trials, psychosocial interventions, cognitive intervention, behavioral interventions, software as a medical device

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review