Cited by 102Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHealth and Lifestyle StudiesDiversity and Career in Medicine

Preventive, Lifestyle, and Personal Health Behaviors Among Physicians

Bazargan, M., Makar, M., Bazargan-Hejazi, S., Ani, C., Wolf, K. E.·2009·Academic Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study examines personal health behaviors and wellness, health-related lifestyles, and prevention screening practices among licensed physicians.Methods An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 1,875 physicians practicing in California. Data from 763 returned questionnaires (41%) were analyzed.Results Our data show that 7% of this sample were clinically depressed, 13% reported using sedatives or tranquilizers, over 53% reported severe to moderate stress, and only 38% described their level of daily stress as slight. About 4% self-reported recent marijuana use. More than 6% screened positive for alcohol abuse and 5% for gambling problems. Thirty-five percent of participants reported "no" or "occasional" exercise. About 27% self-reported "never" or "occasionally" eating breakfast. In addition, 34% reported 6 or fewer hours of sleep daily, while 21% self-reported working more than 60 hours per week. Physicians' excessive number of work hours (more than 65 hours per week) was associated with lack of exercise, not eating breakfast, and sleeping fewer than 6 hours per night. California physicians report breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening behaviors that exceeded population estimates in California and Healthy People 2010 national goals.Conclusion Additional interventions designed to improve physicians' lifestyles and personal health behaviors should be encouraged. A focus on creating healthy lifestyles will benefit physicians as much as the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ap.33.4.289

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bazargan, M., Makar, M., Bazargan-Hejazi, S., Ani, C., & Wolf, K. E.
Affiliations
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Bazargan, M.
Venue
Academic Psychiatry
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
289-295
ISSN
1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081759367
Cited by
102
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
physician well-being, lifestyle habits, preventive screening, depression, sedative use, occupational stress, cannabis use, alcohol abuse, problem gambling, physical activity, breakfast skipping, sleep duration, working hours, cancer screening, California physicians
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, California, Ethnicity, Feeding Behavior, Female, Gambling, Health Status, Humans, Life Style, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Exercise, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review