Cited by 1Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Chapter 4. Specific Phobias

Emmelkamp, Paul M.G., Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich·2008·Stress-Induced and Fear Circuitry Disorders: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.books.9780890427750.lg04

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Wittchen, H.-U.
Venue
Stress-Induced and Fear Circuitry Disorders: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V
Published
2008-12-17
Pages
77-101
OpenAlex
W4405070142
Cited by
1
References
7
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
specific phobia, anxiety disorders, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review