The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Coil-Cortex Distance Relates to Age, Motor Threshold, and Antidepressant Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a tool with antidepressant potential that uses a coil placed on the scalp to produce a powerful magnetic field that directly stimulates only the outermost cortex. MRI scans were obtained in 29 depressed adults involved in an rTMS antidepressant clinical treatment. These scans were analyzed to investigate the effect of distance from coil to cortex on clinical parameters. Longer motor cortex distance, but not prefrontal distance, strongly correlated with increased motor threshold (P<0.01). Clinical antidepressant response did not correlate with either distance. The rTMS antidepressant responders, however, were significantly younger (t=-2.430, P<0.05), and there appears to be a maximum threshold of age and distance to prefrontal cortex for response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Caudate Nuclei in Depression: Preliminary Observations
Krishnan, K. R. R. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820070047007 · Cited by 365
Cited by
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 · Cited by 5,367
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Self-citationRossi, S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Bikson, M., Brewer, C., Brockmöller, J., Carpenter, L. L., Cincotta, M., Chen, R., Daskalakis, J. D., et al. (2021) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 · Cited by 1,573
Self-citationTherapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review
Wassermann, E. M., & Lisanby, S. H. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00585-5 · Cited by 601
Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis
Burt, T., Lisanby, S. H., & Sackeim, H. A. (2002) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145702002791 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozel, F. A., Nahas, Z. H., DeBrux, C., Molloy, M. A., Lorberbaum, J. P., Bohning, D. E., Risch, S. C., & George, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropsychiatry
- Publisher
- American Psychiatric Association Publishing
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-384
- ISSN
- 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125001777
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Coil-Cortex Distance Relates to Age, Motor Threshold, and Antidepressant Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.3.376
- The paper
- Kozel, F. A., Nahas, Z. H., DeBrux, C., Molloy, M. A., Lorberbaum, J. P., Bohning, D. E., Risch, S. C., & George, M. S. (2000). How Coil-Cortex Distance Relates to Age, Motor Threshold, and Antidepressant Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Journal of Neuropsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.3.376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
