Cited by 63Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Community Mental Health Provider Modifications to Cognitive Therapy: Implications for Sustainability

Open access
Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon, Calloway, Amber, Toder, Katherine, Miller, Christopher J., DeVito, Andrea K., Meisel, Samuel N., Xhezo, Regina, Evans, Arthur C. +2 more·2013·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study identified modifications to an evidence-based psychosocial treatment (cognitive therapy) within a community mental health system after clinicians had received intensive training and consultation. METHODS: A coding system, consisting of four types of contextual modifications, 12 types of content-related modifications, seven levels at which modifications can occur, and a code for changes to training or evaluation processes, was applied to data from interviews with 27 clinicians who treat adult consumers within a mental health system. RESULTS: Nine of 12 content modifications were endorsed, and four (tailoring, integration into other therapeutic approaches, loosening structure, and drift) accounted for 65% of all modifications identified. Contextual modifications were rarely endorsed by clinicians in this sample. Modifications typically occurred at the client or clinician level. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in community mental health settings made several modifications to an evidence-based practice (EBP), often in an effort to improve the fit of the intervention to the client's needs or to the clinician's therapeutic style. These findings have implications for implementation and sustainability of EBPs in community settings, client-level outcomes, and training and consultation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201200456

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providers of psychosocial interventions frequently modify interventions for a variety of reasons, including perceived client preferences, providers' preferences or self-efficacy, and efforts to maintain a good therapeutic alliance.

    “Providers of psychosocial interventions frequently modify interventions for a variety of reasons, including perceived client preferences, providers’ preferences or self-efficacy [54], and efforts to maintain a good therapeutic alliance [55–58].”
  • Providers may over-report some forms of modification, while underreporting others.

    “Providers may over-report some forms of modification (c.f., [56]), while underreporting others.”

    From The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (2019) · cites this paper as [56]

    The citation is attached to the suggestion that providers may over-report modifications. The Discussion (page unavailable) says clinician descriptions were not checked against session observations and that clinicians and observers might differ, but it does not say providers may over-report any form of modification. I searched for over-reporting and self-report bias in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Lundgren L Amodeo M Cohen A Modifications of evidence-based practices in community-based addiction treatment organizations: a qualitative research study Addictive Behaviors 36 630 635 2011 21310541
  2. [4]McHugh RK Barlow DH The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: a review of current efforts American Psychologist 65 73 84 2010 20141263
  3. [5]Karlin BE Brown GK Trockel M National dissemination of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system: therapist and patient-level outcomes Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 80 707 718 2012 22823859
  4. [8]Butler AC Chapman JE Forman EM The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses Clinical Psychology Review 26 17 31 2006 16199119
  5. [10]Stirman SW Development of a framework and coding system for modifications made to evidence-based programs and interventions 2012 submitted PMC3686699 23758995
  6. [11]Landis JR Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 159 174 1977 843571
  7. [12]Stanton B Guo J Cottrell L The complex business of adapting effective interventions to new populations: an urban to rural transfer Journal of Adolescent Health 2005 37 163 17 26 16026728

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Calloway, A., Toder, K., Miller, C. J., DeVito, A. K., Meisel, S. N., Xhezo, R., Evans, A. C., Beck, A. T., & Crits-Christoph, P.
Affiliations
  • Dr. Wiltsey Stirman is affiliated with the Women’s Health Sciences Division, Veterans Affairs (VA) National Center for PTSD at the VA Boston Healthcare System, and with the Department of Psychiatry, Boston University, 150 S. Huntington Ave. (116B3), Boston, MA 02130 (e-mail: ). Ms. Calloway is with the Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston. Ms. Toder, Dr. Beck, and Dr. Crits-Christoph are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Dr. Miller is...
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2013-10
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1056-1059
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2000632076
Cited by
63
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (R25 MH080916-01A2)
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • Washington University in St. Louis (R25 MH080916-01A2)
  • Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (R25 MH080916-01A2)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH080916, R00 MH 01800, R00MH080100, K08MH001800, R25MH080916)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
cognitive therapy, evidence-based practice, treatment modification, community mental health services, implementation sustainability
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review