Cited by 79Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

A Controlled Trial of Supported Employment for People With Severe Mental Illness and Justice Involvement

Bond, Gary R., Kim, Sunny Jung, Becker, Deborah R., Swanson, Sarah J., Drake, Robert E., Krzos, Izabela M., Fraser, Virginia V., O'Neill, Sheila +1 more·2015·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Objective Employment is a key to participation in community life for people with severe mental illness, especially those who have been involved in the criminal justice system. Although the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment has been established as an evidence-based practice for helping people with severe mental illness attain competitive employment, little is known about whether IPS is effective for people with severe mental illness who have a history of arrest or incarceration. This study examined this question. Methods A randomized controlled trial examined competitive employment outcomes for 85 participants with severe mental illness and justice involvement who were assigned to IPS or to a comparison group that offered a job club approach with peer support. Results At one-year follow-up, a greater proportion of participants in the IPS group than in the comparison group had obtained competitive employment (31% versus 7%; p Conclusions Although IPS was shown to be an effective model for helping justice-involved clients with severe mental illness achieve employment, the outcomes were modest compared with those in prior IPS studies. The IPS model provided a useful framework for employment services for this population, but augmentations may be needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201400510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common themes in unsuccessful employment and social support interventions included not considering the participants' strengths or interests, starting in the community (as opposed to during incarceration), or offering employment opportunities limited to only low-skill, minimum wage work.

    “Common themes in unsuccessful employment and social support interventions included not considering the participants’ strengths or interests, starting in the community (as opposed to during incarceration) or offering employment opportunities limited to only low-skill, minimum wage work.48,50,52,54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, G. R., Kim, S. J., Becker, D. R., Swanson, S. J., Drake, R. E., Krzos, I. M., Fraser, V. V., O'Neill, S., & Frounfelker, R. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
1027-1034
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W1772657935
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
supported employment, Individual Placement and Support, severe mental illness, criminal justice involvement, incarceration, competitive employment, job clubs, peer support, hospitalization, employment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Social Justice, Employment, Supported, Evidence-Based Practice, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review