A Controlled Trial of Supported Employment for People With Severe Mental Illness and Justice Involvement
Abstract
Objective Employment is a key to participation in community life for people with severe mental illness, especially those who have been involved in the criminal justice system. Although the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment has been established as an evidence-based practice for helping people with severe mental illness attain competitive employment, little is known about whether IPS is effective for people with severe mental illness who have a history of arrest or incarceration. This study examined this question. Methods A randomized controlled trial examined competitive employment outcomes for 85 participants with severe mental illness and justice involvement who were assigned to IPS or to a comparison group that offered a job club approach with peer support. Results At one-year follow-up, a greater proportion of participants in the IPS group than in the comparison group had obtained competitive employment (31% versus 7%; p Conclusions Although IPS was shown to be an effective model for helping justice-involved clients with severe mental illness achieve employment, the outcomes were modest compared with those in prior IPS studies. The IPS model provided a useful framework for employment services for this population, but augmentations may be needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common themes in unsuccessful employment and social support interventions included not considering the participants' strengths or interests, starting in the community (as opposed to during incarceration), or offering employment opportunities limited to only low-skill, minimum wage work.
“Common themes in unsuccessful employment and social support interventions included not considering the participants’ strengths or interests, starting in the community (as opposed to during incarceration) or offering employment opportunities limited to only low-skill, minimum wage work.48,50,52,54”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
Cites
Burns, T., Catty, J., Becker, T., Drake, R. E., Fioritti, A., Knapp, M., Lauber, C., Rössler, W., Tomov, T., van Busschbach, J., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61516-5 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frederick, D. E., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212208 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Metcalfe, J. D., Drake, R. E., & Bond, G. R. (2018) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx132 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationNoyes, S., Sokolow, H., & Arbesman, M. (2018) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2018.033068 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review
Hawks, L., Lopoo, E., Puglisi, L., Cellini, J., Thompson, K., Halberstam, A., Tolliver, D., Martinez-Hamilton, S., & Wang, E. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Americas · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100150 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bond, G. R., Kim, S. J., Becker, D. R., Swanson, S. J., Drake, R. E., Krzos, I. M., Fraser, V. V., O'Neill, S., & Frounfelker, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1027-1034
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W1772657935
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- supported employment, Individual Placement and Support, severe mental illness, criminal justice involvement, incarceration, competitive employment, job clubs, peer support, hospitalization, employment effects
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Social Justice, Employment, Supported, Evidence-Based Practice, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review