Cited by 39Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealth, Medicine and SocietyMental Health Treatment and Access

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) Evaluation Study: Impact on Quantitative Treatment Limits

Open access
Thalmayer, Amber Gayle, Friedman, Sarah A., Azocar, Francisca, Harwood, Jessica M., Ettner, Susan L.·2017·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) significantly changed regulations governing behavioral health benefits for large, commercially insured employers. Pre-MHPAEA, many plans covered only a specific number of behavioral health treatment days or visits; post-MHPAEA, such quantitative treatment limits (QTLs) were allowed only if they were "at parity" with medical-surgical limits. This study assessed MHPAEA's effect on the prevalence of behavioral health QTLs. METHODS: Analyses used 2008-2013 specialty behavioral health benefit design data for Optum large-group plans, both carve-outs (N=2,257 plan-years, corresponding to 1,527 plans and 40 employers) and carve-ins (N=11,644 plan-years, 3,569 plans, and 340 employers). Descriptive statistics were calculated for limits existing at parity implementation, distinguished by accumulation period (annual or lifetime), level of care (inpatient, intermediate, or outpatient), unit (days, visits, or courses), condition, and network level. Proportions of plans using specific limits during the preparity (2008-2009), transition (2010), and postparity (2011-2013) periods were compared with Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Preparity, the most common QTLs were annual visit or day limits. Accounting for overlap in limit types, 89% of regular carve-out plans, 90% of in-network-only carve-outs, and 77% of carve-in plans limited outpatient visits; 66% of regular carve-out plans, 74% of in-network-only carve-outs, and 73% of carve-ins limited inpatient or intermediate days. Postparity, QTLs almost entirely disappeared (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Before MHPAEA, QTLs were common. Postimplementation, virtually all plans dropped such limits, suggesting that MHPAEA was effective at eliminating QTLs. However, increasing access to behavioral health care will mean going beyond such QTL changes and looking at other areas of benefit management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201600110

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thalmayer, A. G., Friedman, S. A., Azocar, F., Harwood, J. M., & Ettner, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
435-442
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2567081223
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR000121)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R36 HS024866)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA032619)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, employer-sponsored health insurance
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Humans, Insurance, Health, Mental Health Services, United States, Insurance Coverage, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review