Cited by 54Healthcare Policy and ManagementOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Medicaid benefits for addiction treatment expanded after implementation of the Affordable Care Act

Open access
Andrews, Christina M., Grogan, Colleen M., Smith, Bikki Tran, Abraham, Amanda J., Pollack, Harold A., Humphreys, Keith, Westlake, Melissa A., Friedmann, Peter D.·2018·Health Affairs

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established a minimum standard of insurance benefits for addiction treatment and expanded federal parity regulations to selected Medicaid benefit plans, which required state Medicaid programs to make changes to their addiction treatment benefits. We surveyed Medicaid programs in all fifty states and the District of Columbia regarding their addiction treatment benefits and utilization controls in standard and alternative benefit plans in 2014 and 2017, when plans were subject to ACA parity requirements. The number of state plans that provided benefits for residential treatment and opioid use disorder medications increased substantially. States imposing annual service limits on outpatient addiction treatment decreased by over 50 percent. Fewer states required preauthorization for services, with the largest reductions for medications treating opioid use disorder. The ACA may have prompted state Medicaid programs to expand addiction treatment benefits and reduce utilization controls in alternative benefit plans. This trend was also observed among standard Medicaid plans not subject to ACA parity laws, which suggests a potential spillover effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0272

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ACA increased the number of insurance choices available.

    “including an increase in insurance choices (Abraham et al., 2017; Andrews et al., 2018; Feder et al., 2017).”

    From Healthcare utilization of individuals with substance use disorders following Affordable Care Act implementation in a California healthcare system (2020) · cites this paper as Andrews et al., 2018

    The Study Results (Alternative Benefit Coverage; page unavailable) report an increase in the number of states offering an alternative Medicaid benefit plan. The paper does not establish that individuals had more insurance plans to choose from; its finding concerns plan availability across states and addiction-treatment benefits. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Department of Health and Human Services. Facing addiction in America: the surgeon general’s report on alcohol, drugs, and health [Internet]. Washington (DC): HHS; 11 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 1]. Available from: https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-generals-report.pdf 28252892
  2. [17]Priest KC, Leof AW, McCarty D, King V. Medicaid coverage for residential substance use disorder treatment: addressing the Institution for Mental Disease exclusion policy. Health Affairs Blog [blog on the Internet]. 2017 8 31 [cited 2018 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170831.061745/full/ · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, C. M., Grogan, C. M., Smith, B. T., Abraham, A. J., Pollack, H. A., Humphreys, K., Westlake, M. A., & Friedmann, P. D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Baystate Health (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2018-08
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1216-1222
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2887386573
Cited by
54
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS000084)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA034634)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
Medicaid, addiction treatment, Affordable Care Act, parity law, medication-assisted treatment, residential treatment, utilization control, prior authorization, state Medicaid programs, spillover effects, health insurance coverage
MeSH terms
Medicaid, United States, Insurance Coverage, Substance-Related Disorders, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review