Expedited Medicaid Enrollment, Service Use, and Recidivism at 36 Months Among Released Prisoners With Severe Mental Illness
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined long-term outcomes (at 36 months) from Washington State's policy of expediting Medicaid enrollment for prison releasees with severe mental illness and compares them with previously reported short-term outcomes (at 12 months). METHODS: Linked administrative data on prison releasees (2006-2007) were analyzed by using a quasi-experimental design comparing those referred to expedited Medicaid (N=895) with a control group of those not referred (N=2,189). Aggregate outcomes were analyzed with inverse probability of treatment-weighted logit models. RESULTS: Expedited Medicaid had a sustained effect on both increased months of enrollment (p<.01) and increased use of community mental health and general medical services (p<.01) 36 months after prison release. However, expedited Medicaid did not reduce criminal recidivism, consistent with 12-month findings, Conclusions: Outcome results at 12 months were sustained at 36 months-namely, expedited Medicaid for released prisoners with severe mental illness improved enrollment and service use with no effects on criminal recidivism.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A Washington state study found that expedited referral to Medicaid and linkage to care for those with serious mental illness resulted in increased rates of recidivism at 12 months (55% vs 46%, p<0.01), mostly explained by technical violations.
“Finally, a study from Washington state which examined the effect of an expedited referral to Medicaid and linkage to care for those with serious mental illness found the treatment group had increased rates of recidivism at 12 months (55% versus 46%, p<0.01), mostly explained by technical violations.”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCommunity mental health use increased in the intervention group compared to services as usual (69% vs. 37%, p < .01).
“Community mental health (69% vs. 37%, p < .01)”
From Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Unexpectedly, a significantly greater proportion of the intervention versus comparison group spent any days in jail (43 vs. 34%, p < .01) and state prison (56% vs. 46%, p < .01), with no significant difference in the proportion with any arrests (59% vs. 54%).
“Unexpectedly, there was a significantly greater proportion of those in the intervention versus comparison group that spent any days in jail (43 vs. 34%, p < .01) and state prison (56% vs. 46%, p < .01), with no significant difference in the proportion with any arrests (59% vs. 54%) at follow-up.”
From Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Outpatient primary care use increased in the intervention group compared to services as usual (64% vs. 42%, p < .01).
“outpatient primary care (64% vs. 42%, p < .01)”
From Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Emergency room use increased in the intervention group compared to services as usual (55% vs. 35%, p < .01).
“emergency room use (55% vs. 35%, p < .01)”
From Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
In Washington State, 12 months post-implementation, 81% of the expedited Medicaid group and 43% of the services as usual group were enrolled in Medicaid (p < .01).
“Twelve months post-implementation, 81% of the expedited group and 43% of the services as usual group were enrolled in Medicaid, (p < .01).”
From Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2005) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281756 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Bonta, J. L., Law, M. A., & Hanson, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.123 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Transitions from Prison to Community: Understanding Individual Pathways
Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Medicaid Increases Emergency-Department Use: Evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment
Taubman, S. L., ALLEN, H. L., Wright, B. J., D, K. B. A., & Finkelstein, A. N. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246183 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Toward evidence-based practice for probationers and parolees mandated to mental health treatment.
Skeem, J., & Louden, J. (2006) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.333 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Moral Reconation Therapy: A Systematic Step-by-Step Treatment System for Treatment Resistant Clients
Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1988) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1988.62.1.135 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Mark, T. L., Yee, T., Levit, K. R., Camacho-Cook, J., Cutler, E., & Carroll, C. D. (2016) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0002 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
MORRISSEY, J. P., Dalton, K., Steadman, H. J., Cuddeback, G. S., Haynes, D., & Cuellar, A. E. (2006) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.6.803 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMorrissey, J. P., Domino, M. E., & Cuddeback, G. S. (2016) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500305 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationMedicaid Policies and Practices in US State Prison Systems
Rosen, D. L., Dumont, D. M., Cislo, A. M., Brockmann, B. W., Traver, A. E., & Rich, J. D. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301563 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Domino, M. E. (2016) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500306 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity
Castillo, E. G., Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R., Shadravan, S., Moore, E., Mensah, M. O., Docherty, M., Aguilera Nunez, M. G., Barcelo, N., Goodsmith, N., Halpin, L. E., et al. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity
Castillo, E. G., Ijadi‐Maghsoodi, R., Shadravan, S. M., Moore, E. M., Mensah, M. O., Docherty, M. J., Nunez, M. G. A., Barceló, N. E., Goodsmith, N., Halpin, L. E., et al. (2020) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.18102 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Domino, M. E., Gertner, A., Grabert, B., Cuddeback, G. S., Childers, T., & Morrissey, J. P. (2019) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13128 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationMedicaid Expansion’s Spillover to the Criminal Justice System: Evidence from Six Urban Counties
Fry, C. E., McGuire, T. G., & Frank, R. G. (2020) · RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2020.6.2.11 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Arnau, F., García-Guerrero, J., Benito, A., Vera-Remartínez, E. J., Baquero, A., & Haro, G. (2019) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14137 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Gertner, A. K., Grabert, B. K., Domino, M. E., Cuddeback, G. S., & MORRISSEY, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.010 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCommunity investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review
Hawks, L., Lopoo, E., Puglisi, L., Cellini, J., Thompson, K., Halberstam, A., Tolliver, D., Martinez-Hamilton, S., & Wang, E. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Americas · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100150 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
In-Kind Welfare Benefits and Reincarceration Risk: Evidence from Medicaid
Burns, M. E., & Dague, L. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31394 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Health Care and Behavioral Service Use by Medicaid-Enrolled Adults After Release From Incarceration
Balio, C. P., Norwood, C. W., McFarlane, T., Rusyniak, D. E., & Blackburn, J. L. (2022) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.202200035 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Behavioral health service use post‐jail release and reduced risk of return to jail
Smith, J. L., Khatri, U. G., Olubiyi, O., Hadley, T. R., Lim, S., Mandell, D. S., & Kang‐Yi, C. D. (2022) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.22813 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mental Health of Individuals Within Incarceration: A Systematic Literature Review
Valladares, S. I. (2021) · DigitalCommons@UNMC · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fry, C. (2020) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
Blumberger, L., Calo, W. A., Mallinson, D. J., Liu, G., & LESLIE, D. L. (2024) · Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1176/appi.prcp.20230080
Tremblay, M. C., Castellanos, A., Kohli, R., Espinosa, E. M., & Roderick, T. (2026) · INFORMS journal on computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2024.0663
Brooker, C., & Sirdifield, C. (2026) · European Journal of Probation · doi:10.1177/20662203261450862
- Authors
- Grabert, B. K., Gertner, A. K., Domino, M. E., Cuddeback, G. S., & Morrissey, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2017-10-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1079-1082
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2610389368
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- released prisoners, severe mental illness, recidivism, Medicaid enrollment, community mental health services, medical service use, long-term outcomes, Washington State
- MeSH terms
- Recidivism, Adult, Mental Disorders, Humans, Medicaid, Mental Health Services, Prisoners, Time Factors, United States, Washington, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review