Cited by 12Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Implementation of Contingency Management at a Large VA Addiction Treatment Center

Open access
Ruan, Hang, Bullock, Cody L., Reger, Greg M.·2017·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based intervention that reinforces target behaviors of patients, such as abstinence from substance use. This column discusses the experiences and lessons learned at a large U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Addiction Treatment Center during implementation of CM as part of the VA's national rollout. Challenges are discussed related to staff reception and limited initial referrals, identifying a drug testing method and staff confidence in that method, training requirements, and financial resources needed. Local innovations and CM expansion since 2012 are also reviewed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201700242

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contingency management is the most promising behavioural treatment but is yet to become routinely available owing to implementation challenges.

    “Contingency management, the use of structured incentives to promote abstinence, is the most promising behavioural treatment but is yet to become routinely available owing to implementation challenges [10].”

    From Psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder: A pilot open‐label safety and feasibility study. (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract describes contingency management as an evidence-based intervention that reinforces behaviors such as abstinence. The section “CM IMPLEMENTATION AT THE VA'S LARGEST ATC” says its uptake in community treatment programs remains low despite its efficacy, and the Implementation Challenges section describes barriers to adoption. The paper does not establish the comparative claim that it is the most promising behavioural treatment. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruan, H., Bullock, C. L., & Reger, G. M.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
68
Issue
12
Pages
1207-1209
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2754028604
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
contingency management, addiction treatment, veterans, addiction treatment centers, implementation barriers, employee training, drug testing, referral barriers, financial resources, evidence-based interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Motivation, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Program Development, Disease Management, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review