Cited by 53LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyMental Health Treatment and AccessAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

A qualitative investigation of engagement in mental health services among black and Hispanic LGB young adults

Open access
Moore, Kiara L., Lopez, Lucy, Camacho, David, Munson, Michelle R.·2020·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little attention has been paid to engagement in mental health services among racially and ethnically diverse youths who identify as a sexual minority, despite research indicating that they face significant mental health disparities. In this study, the authors assessed the service use experiences of black and Hispanic lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults to identify factors that promoted or hindered their engagement. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 38 young adults regarding past and present experiences with mental health services were analyzed thematically for perceived challenges to and support for engagement. Participants' service use histories were reviewed for significant interruptions in services reported over the past year. RESULTS: Seventeen participants (45%) reported disengagement despite continuing to need services. Factors that influenced engagement were identified across four domains: personal, social environment, accessibility, and provider characteristics. Stigma related to sexual orientation and cultural attitudes presented engagement barriers, whereas providers who were knowledgeable about sexual-minority issues were important engagement promoters. Additional barriers to engagement were ambivalence about treatment efficacy, lack of family support, and difficulty finding suitable and affordable care. Peers who identified as a sexual minority helped participants locate LGB-affirming services. Rapport with providers and health care autonomy assisted participants to manage barriers to engagement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer insights about factors that can influence engagement with treatment among black and Hispanic LGB young adults. The findings reveal important provider competencies and can inform interventions to improve engagement and reduce mental health inequities among these youths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201900399

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LGBTQ+ persons often report a lack of access to affirming care.

    “Importantly, LGBTQ+ persons often report a lack of access to affirming care [15].”

    From A randomized trial of acceptance-based behavioral therapy to improve mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ persons: Study protocol (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (Provider Characteristics; page not provided) describe participants who valued LGBT-knowledgeable providers and one who felt uncomfortable with a provider's stereotypical views. The Abstract (Results; page not provided) also reports difficulty finding suitable care and help locating LGB-affirming services. The study concerns mental health care for Black and Hispanic LGB young adults, so it does not establish how often LGBTQ+ persons generally report this barrier across care settings. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Results From the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. Pub no SMA-14–4887. Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014 27656739

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, K. L., Lopez, L., Camacho, D., & Munson, M. R.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
555-561
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W3001621980
Cited by
53
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG049666, P30AG022845)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH111861)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
mental health service engagement, Black young adults, Hispanic young adults, sexual minority mental health, mental health disparities, barriers to treatment, stigma, provider competence, family support, health care access, peer support, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, New York, Social Environment, Qualitative Research, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review