Cited by 143Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Brief Reports: Prospective Assessment of Treatment Use by Patients With Personality Disorders

Open access
Bender, Donna S., Skodol, Andrew E., Pagano, Maria E., Dyck, Ingrid R., Grilo, Carlos M., Shea, M. Tracie, Sanislow, Charles A., Zanarini, Mary C. +3 more·2006·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the utilization of mental health treatments over a three-year period among patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorders compared with patients with major depressive disorder and no personality disorder. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study design was used to measure treatment use for 633 individuals aged 18 to 45 years during a three-year period. RESULTS: Patients with borderline personality disorder were significantly more likely than those with major depressive disorder to use most types of treatment. Furthermore, all patients continued using high-intensity, low-duration treatments throughout the study period, whereas individual psychotherapy attendance declined significantly after one year. CONCLUSIONS: Although our data showed that patients with borderline personality disorder used more mental health services than those with major depressive disorder, many questions remain about the adequacy of the treatment received by all patients with personality disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.254

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J, et al: Mental health service utilization of borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for six years. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65:28-36, 2004
  2. [6]6. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition. New York, Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Pagano, M. E., Dyck, I. R., Grilo, C. M., Shea, M. T., Sanislow, C. A., Zanarini, M. C., Yen, S., McGlashan, T. H., & Gunderson, J. G.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2006-02
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
254-257
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2139952485
Cited by
143
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Wesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Wesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • WESLEYAN
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH50850, MH 50840, MH-50837, MH 50839, MH 50838, K23MH073708, R10MH050850, R10MH050837, R01MH050838, R01MH050837, R01MH050840, R01MH050839, R01MH050850, R10MH050840, K23MH069904, R10MH050838, R10MH050839)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
personality disorders, mental health treatment utilization, borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, major depressive disorder, individual psychotherapy, treatment continuity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personality Assessment, Personality Disorders, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review