Cited by 288Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Disentangling emotion processes in borderline personality disorder: Physiological and self-reported assessment of biological vulnerability, baseline intensity, and reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli

Open access
Kuo, Janice R., Linehan, Marsha M.·2009·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated M. Linehan's (1993) theory that individuals meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) have high biological vulnerability to emotion dysregulation, including high baseline emotional intensity and high reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli. Twenty individuals with BPD, 20 age-matched individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD), and 20 age-matched normal controls (NCs) participated in 2 separate emotion induction conditions, a standardized condition, and a personally relevant condition. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), skin conductance response (SCR), and self-report measures were collected throughout the experiment. BPD participants displayed heightened biological vulnerability compared with NCs as indicated by reduced basal RSA. BPD participants also exhibited high baseline emotional intensity, characterized by heightened SCR and heightened self-reported negative emotions at baseline. However, the BPD group did not display heightened reactivity, as their physiological and self-reported changes from baseline to the emotion inductions tasks were not greater than the other 2 groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016392

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with AUD and only one comorbid disorder (AUD-1) had a mean DERS total score (M = 87.8), above the normal range and corresponding to levels found among clinical samples of self-harming college students, individuals diagnosed with social anxiety disorder, and treatment-seeking individuals with cocaine use disorder.

    “individuals with an AUD and only one comorbid disorder (AUD-1) had a mean DERS total score (M = 87.8), above the “normal” range and corresponding to levels found among clinical samples of self-harming college students (Gratz & Chapman, 2007; Gratz & Roemer, 2008), individuals diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (Kuo & Linehan, 2009) and treatment-seeking individuals with cocaine use disorder (”

    From Difficulties in emotion regulation in treatment-seeking alcoholics with and without co-occurring mood and anxiety disorders. (2018) · cites this paper as Kuo & Linehan, 2009

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with BPD report higher baseline negative emotion than controls, but no heightened reactivity to emotional stimuli was found.

    “Newer evidence suggests that people with a BPD diagnosis indeed report experiencing high levels of baseline negative emotion relative to controls although heightened reactivity in the presence of emotional stimuli was not found”

    From Impact of dialectical behavior therapy versus community treatment by experts on emotional experience, expression, and acceptance in borderline personality disorder (2014) · cites this paper as Kuo & Linehan, 2009

    The Results (Baseline Negative Emotional Intensity) report significantly higher self-reported baseline negative emotion in the BPD group than in nonclinical controls, but no significant difference from the social-anxiety-disorder control group. The Discussion (Emotional Reactivity) reports no greater self-reported or physiological reactivity in BPD. Thus, the baseline comparison is supported for one control group, not controls generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among non-clinical samples or samples of normal controls, the DERS total score ranges from the mid 50s on the low end to the mid 70s on the high end.

    “our review of the literature indicates that among non-clinical samples or samples of normal controls, the total score ranges from the mid 50’s on the low end to the mid 70’s on the high end (Gratz & Tull, 2015; Kuo & Linehan, 2009; Fox et al, 2007).”

    From Difficulties in emotion regulation in treatment-seeking alcoholics with and without co-occurring mood and anxiety disorders. (2018) · cites this paper as Kuo & Linehan, 2009

    The Results section (Self-Report Measures; page unavailable) says the study measured total DERS scores in normal controls and refers to Table 3, but the passages from our copy do not give their scores. Searches for the control-group DERS total and values in the mid 50s or mid 70s did not locate the claimed range. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Williams J Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) 1995 New York Biometrics Research Department, NY State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo, J. R., & Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2009-08
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
531-544
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2033553478
Cited by
288
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH068887)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, emotional dysregulation, biological vulnerability, emotional reactivity, emotion induction, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, skin conductance response, social anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Borderline Personality Disorder, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Female, Fourier Analysis, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychophysiology, Risk Factors, Self-Assessment, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Social Environment, Sympathetic Nervous System, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review