Cited by 27Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Randomized Controlled Trial of Outpatient Mentalization-Based Treatment Versus Structured Clinical Management for Borderline Personality Disorder

Bateman, Anthony, Fonagy, Peter·2010·Focus

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of an 18-month mentalization-based treatment (MBT) approach in an outpatient context against a structured clinical management (SCM) outpatient approach for treatment of borderline personality disorder. Method: Patients (N=134) consecutively referred to a specialist personality disorder treatment center and meeting selection criteria were randomly allocated to MBT or SCM. Eleven mental health professionals equal in years of experience and training served as therapists. Independent evaluators blind to treatment allocation conducted assessments every 6 months. The primary outcome was the occurrence of crisis events, a composite of suicidal and severe self-injurious behaviors and hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included social and interpersonal functioning and self-reported symptoms. Outcome measures, assessed at 6-month intervals, were analyzed using mixed effects logistic regressions for binary data, Poisson regression models for count data, and mixed effects linear growth curve models for self-report variables. Results: Substantial improvements were observed in both conditions across all outcome variables. Patients randomly assigned to MBT showed a steeper decline of both self-reported and clinically significant problems, including suicide attempts and hospitalization. Conclusions: Structured treatments improve outcomes for individuals with borderline personality disorder. A focus on specific psychological processes brings additional benefits to structured clinical support. Mentalization-based treatment is relatively undemanding in terms of training so it may be useful for implementation into general mental health services. Further evaluations by independent research groups are now required. (Reprinted with permission from American Journal of Psychiatry 2009; 166:1355–1364)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/foc.8.1.foc55

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bateman 2010 was at low risk for treatment adherence because adherence was monitored through supervision, verbatim session reports, and a monitoring form.

    “Treatment adherence?Low risk Adherence to therapy was monitored through supervision, verbatim session reports, and completion of a monitoring form about activities and interventions of therapists.”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 2010

  • Bateman 2010 was at high risk of allegiance bias because both authors are founders of mentalisation-based treatment, the experimental treatment.

    “Allegiance effect improbable? High risk There is no indication given for an allegiance effect.However, as both authors are the founders of MBT, the treatment actually used in the experimental group, an allegiance effect seems not improbable.”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 2010

  • Bateman 2010 was at low risk of detection bias because outcome assessors were blind.

    “Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors were blind (Bateman 2010).”

    From Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. (2012) · cites this paper as Bateman 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
  • Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (GB)
  • St Ann’s Hospital (GB)
Venue
Focus
Published
2010-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
55-65
ISSN
  • 1541-4094 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4108
OpenAlex
W2103099448
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, mentalization-based treatment, outpatient care, crisis events, suicide attempts, self-harm, hospitalization, therapist training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review