Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach

Matthes, Jörg·2012·American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

As has often been noted, one of the strengths of framing research has been to bridge several research areas in mass communication, such as the origin, journalistic production, content, and effects of news. This article attempts to provide an overview and a review of the cross-disciplinary discourse about framing. Although there are numerous studies on frame construction, frame building, and frame setting, hardly any research has attempted to draw a complete picture of the whole framing process. Based on a definition of frames and framing that can be applied across all stages of the framing process, the design and the methods of an extensive study about a campaign on the naturalization of immigrants are introduced. The merits and insights of such an approach are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002764211426324

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Matthes, J.
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
247-259
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
OpenAlex
W2058573747
Cited by
238
References
3
FWCI
31.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0002764211426324
The paper
Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.