CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Organizational Learning and LeadershipManagement and Organizational StudiesOrganizational Change and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Organizational Learning Under Fire: Theory and Practice

CARLEY, KATHLEEN M., HARRALD, JOHN R.·1997·American Behavioral Scientist
DOI 10.1177/0002764297040003007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002764297040003007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Argote, L., St. Louis meetings of the Institute of Management Sciences (TIMS) and the Operations Research Society (ORSA)
  2. 10.1121/1.1906679 · DOI
  3. Carley, K., 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences
  4. 10.1177/108602669100500102 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1287/orsc.3.1.20 · DOI
  6. Carley, K. & Lin, Z. (in press). A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion. Management Science .
  7. Churchman, C. W., The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organizations
  8. 10.2307/2390725 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/2391099 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00207411.1990.11449156 · DOI
  11. Corkill, D., Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 168
  12. Cyert, R. M., A behavioral theory of the firm
  13. DeGroot, M. H., Optimal statistical decisions
  14. 10.1080/01621459.1974.10480137 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Downs, A., Inside bureaucracy, 10.7249/CB156 · DOI
  16. 10.5465/amr.1984.4277639 · DOI
  17. General Accounting Office, Disaster assistance: Federal, state, and local responses to natural disaster needs improvement GAO/RCED
  18. Grofman, B., Second UC Irvine, Conference on Political Economy
  19. 10.2307/2785672 · DOI
  20. Harrald, J. R., The development of a methodology for American Red Cross staffing of a disaster under the Federal Response Plan
  21. Harrald, J. R., An analysis of the American Red Cross staffing for the Hurricane Hugo and Loma Prieta earthquake disaster relief operations
  22. 10.1287/inte.20.5.14 · DOI
  23. Hastie, R., Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective
  24. Johnson, H. T., Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting
  25. 10.1037/h0057189 · DOI
  26. 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · DOI
  27. Lin, Z. & Carley, K. (1992). Maydays and Murphies: A study of the effect of organizational design, task and stress on organizational performance. Sociological Abstracts . · DOI
  28. 10.2307/973677 · DOI · Paper page
  29. MacKenzie, K. D., Organizational structures
  30. 10.2307/2392340 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb00521.x · DOI
  32. 10.1287/mnsc.1.2.127 · DOI
  33. McGuire, C. B., Decision and organization
  34. Michael, E. J., Air Pollution Control Association Conference, 297
  35. National Fire Protection Association, The Loma Prieta earthquake emergency response and stabilization study
  36. Nelson, R. R., An evolutionary theory of economic change, 10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0008 · DOI
  37. 10.1515/9781400828494 · DOI
  38. Preston, L., 1964, American Economic Review, 54, 100
  39. Price, J. L., The study of turnover
  40. Price, J. L., Professional turnover: The case of nurses
  41. Quarantelli, E. L., Organizational behavior in disasters and implications for disaster planning
  42. 10.1177/108602668900300202 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1287/orsc.1.2.160 · DOI
  44. Rosenberg, N., Inside the block box: Technology and economics
  45. Schein, E. H., Professional education: Some new directions
  46. 10.1037/h0053638 · DOI
  47. 10.1037/h0045969 · DOI
  48. Steinbruner, J. D., The cybernetic theory of decision processes
  49. Thompson, J., Organizations in action, 10.4324/9781315125930 · DOI
  50. Thorndyke, P., Seventh IJCAI, 171
  51. Tushman, M. L., NSF-sponsored Conference on Organizational Learning
  52. Weber, M., Economy and Society
  53. Weingart, L. (1989). Group goals, effort, planning and group performance . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 125

Metadata

Authors
CARLEY, K. M., & HARRALD, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
ORCID
CARLEY, KATHLEEN M.
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1997-01
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
310-332
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
DOI
10.1177/0002764297040003007
OpenAlex
W1967343053
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
Keywords
organizational learning, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review