The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Divided We Stand, United We Fall: Religious Pluralism, Giving, and Volunteering
Open accessAbstract
This article examines to what extent religious context influences giving to, and volunteering for, religious causes—both directly and through increased attendance at religious services—and whether it has unintended spillover effects on giving and volunteering for secular purposes. Results from individuals living in a sample of counties in the United States indicate that a high level of religious pluralism is not associated with an increase in the probability that individuals will attend religious services regularly. Religious pluralism is, however, directly and positively associated with religious volunteering, while the association is not statistically significant for giving. Increases in religious volunteering associated with a high level of religious pluralism do not displace secular volunteering. There is no minority effect: individuals are equally likely to give to, and volunteer for, religious and secular causes whether they live in counties where their religious group represents the majority or the minority of the total population of religious adherents. As the proportion of the population in a county who is religious increases, so does the probability that any one individual will give to, and volunteer for, religious causes. I do not, however, find a relationship between the devoutness of a religious community and an individual's propensity to give to, and volunteer for, secular causes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results are generally supportive of a positive correlation between religious pluralism and volunteering (Borgonovi 2008), which accords well with the longstanding intellectual account and popular image of religious, voluntary associations as a major player in the civic life of America (Bellah 1992; de Tocqueville 2004; Wilson and Janoski 1995; Wuthnow 2004).”
From Catholicism and Its Civic Engagement: Case Studies of the Catholic Church in Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, and Shanghai (2014) · cites this paper as Borgonovi 2008
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,723
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
(1978) · Cited by 5,009
Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence
James Andreoni, A. (1989) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261662 · Cited by 3,165
Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00609 · Cited by 2,810
The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less
Schwartz, B. N. (2004) · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) · Cited by 2,512
The social context of well–being
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 · Cited by 2,504
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Berger Peter, 1967, The Sacred Canopy.
- Bibby Reginald W., 1987, Fragmented Gods: The Power and Potential of Religion in Canada.
- Cialdini Robert, 2001, Influence.
- 10.1177/000312240106600601 · DOI
- Durkheim Emile, 1897, Suicide.
- Finke Roger, 1992, The Churchgoing of America, 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy.
- Hodgkinson Virginia A., 1990, Faith and Philanthropy in America, 93
- Iannaccone Laurence R., 1995, Social Forces, 74, 705
- Independent Sector., 1992, Faith and Philanthropy: The Connection between Charitable Behavior and Giving to Religion.
- Rasbash Jon, 2005, A User's Guide to MlWin.
- 10.1177/000312240206700203 · DOI
- Whiteley Paul, 2004, The Art of Happiness: Is Volunteering the Blueprint for Bliss?
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borgonovi, F. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011 · Cited by 485
Self-citationInfluential Cases in Multilevel Modeling: A Methodological Comment
van der Meer, T., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. J. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122409359166 · Cited by 225
Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines.
DeFranza, D., Lindow, M., Harrison, K., Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000717 · Cited by 184
Resources That Make You Generous: Effects of Social and Human Resources on Charitable Giving
Wiepking, P., & Maas, I. (2009) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.0.0191 · Cited by 171
Trust and Volunteering: Selection or Causation? Evidence From a 4 Year Panel Study
Bekkers, R. (2011) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9165-x · Cited by 174
“(Borgonovi 2008; Leigh 2006; Putnam 2007).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Borgonovi, F.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Borgonovi, Francesca
- ORCID
- Borgonovi, Francesca
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-128
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2011968781
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 20.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
- Keywords
- religious pluralism, religious donations, religious volunteering, religious service attendance, religious minorities, religious majorities, spillover effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
