CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringReligion and Society InteractionsReligion, Society, and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Divided We Stand, United We Fall: Religious Pluralism, Giving, and Volunteering

Open access
Borgonovi, Francesca·2008·American Sociological Review
DOI 10.1177/000312240807300106
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article examines to what extent religious context influences giving to, and volunteering for, religious causes—both directly and through increased attendance at religious services—and whether it has unintended spillover effects on giving and volunteering for secular purposes. Results from individuals living in a sample of counties in the United States indicate that a high level of religious pluralism is not associated with an increase in the probability that individuals will attend religious services regularly. Religious pluralism is, however, directly and positively associated with religious volunteering, while the association is not statistically significant for giving. Increases in religious volunteering associated with a high level of religious pluralism do not displace secular volunteering. There is no minority effect: individuals are equally likely to give to, and volunteer for, religious and secular causes whether they live in counties where their religious group represents the majority or the minority of the total population of religious adherents. As the proportion of the population in a county who is religious increases, so does the probability that any one individual will give to, and volunteer for, religious causes. I do not, however, find a relationship between the devoutness of a religious community and an individual's propensity to give to, and volunteer for, secular causes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312240807300106

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Berger Peter, 1967, The Sacred Canopy.
  2. Bibby Reginald W., 1987, Fragmented Gods: The Power and Potential of Religion in Canada.
  3. Cialdini Robert, 2001, Influence.
  4. 10.1177/000312240106600601 · DOI
  5. Durkheim Emile, 1897, Suicide.
  6. Finke Roger, 1992, The Churchgoing of America, 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy.
  7. Hodgkinson Virginia A., 1990, Faith and Philanthropy in America, 93
  8. Iannaccone Laurence R., 1995, Social Forces, 74, 705
  9. Independent Sector., 1992, Faith and Philanthropy: The Connection between Charitable Behavior and Giving to Religion.
  10. Rasbash Jon, 2005, A User's Guide to MlWin.
  11. 10.1177/000312240206700203 · DOI
  12. Whiteley Paul, 2004, The Art of Happiness: Is Volunteering the Blueprint for Bliss?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borgonovi, F.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Borgonovi, Francesca
ORCID
Borgonovi, Francesca
Venue
American Sociological Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-02
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
105-128
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
DOI
10.1177/000312240807300106
OpenAlex
W2011968781
Cited by
112
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
Keywords
religious pluralism, religious donations, religious volunteering, religious service attendance, religious minorities, religious majorities, spillover effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review