Cited by 451Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringReligion and Society InteractionsReligion, Society, and Development

National Context, Religiosity, and Volunteering: Results from 53 Countries

Open access
Ruiter, Stijn, De Graaf, Nan Dirk·2006·American Sociological Review

Abstract

To what extent does the national religious context affect volunteering? Does a religious environment affect the relation between religiosity and volunteering? To answer these questions, this study specifies individual level, contextual level, and cross-level interaction hypotheses. The authors test the hypotheses by simultaneously studying the impact of religiosity of individuals, the national religious context, and their interplay on volunteering while controlling for possible confounding factors both at individual and contextual levels. Based on multilevel analyses on data from 53 countries, frequent churchgoers are more active in volunteer work and a devout national context has an additional positive effect. However, the difference between secular and religious people is substantially smaller in devout countries than in secular countries. Church attendance is hardly relevant for volunteering in devout countries. Furthermore, religious volunteering has a strong spillover effect, implying that religious citizens also volunteer more for secular organizations. This spillover effect is stronger for Catholics than for Protestants, non-Christians and nonreligious individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312240607100202

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
Corresponding author
Ruiter, Stijn
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2006-04
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
191-210
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2113996845
Cited by
451
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 41
FWCI
33.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
Keywords
volunteering, religiosity, church attendance, religious volunteering, spillover effects, Catholicism, Protestantism, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review