Cited by 152Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial Policy and Reform StudiesPolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession

Brooks, Clem, Manza, Jeff·2013·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Did Americans respond to the recent Great Recession by demanding that government provide policy solutions to rising income insecurity, an expectation of state-of-the-art theorizing on the dynamics of mass opinion? Or did the recession erode support for government activism, in line with alternative scholarship pointing to economic factors having the reverse effect? We find that public support for government social programs declined sharply between 2008 and 2010, yet both fixed-effects and repeated survey analyses suggest economic change had little impact on policy-attitude formation. What accounts for these surprising developments? We consider alternative microfoundations emphasizing the importance of prior beliefs and biases to the formation of policy attitudes. Analyzing the General Social Surveys panel, our results suggest political partisanship has been central. Gallup and Evaluations of Government and Society surveys provide further evidence against the potentially confounding scenario of government overreach, in which federal programs adopted during the recession and the Obama presidency propelled voters away from government. We note implications for theoretical models of opinion formation, as well as directions for partisanship scholarship and interdisciplinary research on the Great Recession.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122413498255

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support for governmental regulation of the economy declined sharply among rank-and-file Republicans between 1984 and 2010, while it remained unchanged among Democrats.

    “support for governmental regulation of the economy declined sharply among rank-and-file Republicans between 1984 and 2010, while it remained unchanged among Democrats175.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, C., & Manza, J.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University
  • New York University (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2013-09-30
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
727-748
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W1966330484
Cited by
152
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
43.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
Great Recession, public opinion, policy attitudes, social programs, government activism, income insecurity, partisanship, opinion formation, economic change, government overreach, Obama administration, public trust in government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review