The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ancestry Matters: Patrilineage Growth and Extinction
Abstract
Patrilineality, the organization of kinship, inheritance, and other key social processes based on patrilineal male descent, has been a salient feature of social organization in China and many other societies for centuries. Because patrilineage continuity or growth was the central focus of reproductive strategies in such societies, we introduce the number of patrilineal male descendants generations later as a stratification outcome. By reconstructing and analyzing 20,000 patrilineages in two prospective, multi-generational population databases from eighteenth- and nineteenth-century China, we show that patrilineages founded by high-status males had higher growth rates for the next 150 years. The elevated growth rate of these patrilineages was due more to their having a lower probability of extinction at each point in time than to surviving patrilineal male descendants having larger numbers of sons on average. As a result, male descendants of high-status males account for a disproportionately large share of the male population in later generations. In China and elsewhere, patrilineal kin network characteristics influence individuals’ life chances; effects of a male founder’s characteristics on patrilineage size many generations later thus represent an indirect channel of status transmission that has not been considered previously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Differential access to resources and differences in social status between groups may reinforce this process, with the high-status groups having greater reproductive success than the low-status groups.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“This variance in reproductive success between descent groups has been observed, for example, in China, where high-status imperial lineages from the 18th to 19th centuries have higher growth rates and lower extinction rates compared to low-status patrilineages45.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“In both cases, reproductive success is transmitted within descent groups, and groups with a high social status tend to have more children in each generation than groups with a low social status.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
Merton, R. K. (1988) · Isis · doi:10.1086/354848 · Cited by 1,397
A Multigenerational View of Inequality
Mare, R. D. (2011) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0014-7 · Cited by 410
One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities, 1700–2000
LEE, J. Z., & Feng, W. (1999) · doi:10.4159/9780674040052 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1080/00324720500099454 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095162 · DOI
- Bean Lee, 1990, Fertility Change on the American Frontier: Adaptation and Innovation, 10.1525/9780520377660 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674020665 · DOI · Paper page
- Betzig Laura L., 1986, Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History
- Blau Peter M., 1967, The American Occupational Structure
- Bongaarts John, 1987, Family Demography: Methods and Their Application
- 10.1093/genetics/51.3.411 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00011-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00054-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1178336 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0267 · DOI
- 10.1086/324126 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1081-602X(01)00088-4 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0145553200010749 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-6733-4_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hisfam.2010.09.003 · DOI
- 10.2753/CSA2162-0555440105 · DOI
- Cavalli-Sforza L. Luca, 1981, Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach
- Cavalli-Sforza L. Luca, 1994, The History and Geography of Human Genes
- 10.1239/aap/1029955258 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400827817 · DOI
- 10.2307/2057769 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/hub.2004.0004 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1118174109 · DOI
- Dherbécourt, Clément. 2013. “La Fortune des Héritiers. Essais sur la transmission du capital en France du Second Empire à la Seconde Guerre mondiale.” PhD dissertation in Economics, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France. · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127 · DOI · Paper page
- Duncan Otis Dudley, 1966, Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, 51
- Erikson Robert, 1992, The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies
- Falconer Douglas S., 1960, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics
- Featherman David L., 1978, Opportunity and Change
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0370164600023993 · DOI
- Freedman Maurice, 1966, Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung
- Galton Francis, 1874, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6, 138
- 10.1098/rspb.2007.1000 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2012.1415 · DOI
- 10.2307/3006017 · DOI
- 10.1086/284601 · DOI
- Harrell Stevan J., 1985, Family and Population in East Asian History, 81
- 10.1016/0162-3095(84)90011-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.397 · DOI
- 10.1177/000276426400800315 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1086/219243 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.21048 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122412464040 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471715816 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.08.006 · DOI
- Lam David, 1986, American Economic Review, 76, 1103
- 10.2307/2658739 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511563058 · DOI
- Lee James Z., 2010, China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset, Liaoning (CMGPD-LN) 1749–1909, User Guide
- Lee James Z., 1993, Old and New Methods in Historical Demography, 361
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0034898 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.103.4.1109 · DOI
- Lotka Alfred J., 1929, Human Biology, 1, 305
- Lotka Alfred J., 1931, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 21, 377
- 10.1214/aoms/1177731600 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1999.1287 · DOI
- 10.1017/CHOL9780521243346.010 · DOI
- 10.1086/670719 · DOI
- 10.1006/ssre.1997.0598 · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240607100402 · DOI
- 10.1080/00324728.1961.10406068 · DOI
- 10.2307/2091028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4054/DemRes.2004.10.7 · DOI
- 10.1086/591690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002214650404500305 · DOI
- 10.1038/329714a0 · DOI
- 10.2307/2094417 · DOI
- 10.1086/230135 · DOI
- Preston Samuel H., 2001, Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes
- 10.1126/science.1159277 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02842 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0623 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00105-8 · DOI
- 10.1353/dem.2002.0010 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.290.5494.1155 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-6733-4_12 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01262.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1973405 · DOI
- Unz Ron, 2013, The American Conservative, 16
- 10.2307/1912557 · DOI · Paper page
- Kenneth W. Wachter, 1978, Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-729150-5.50014-6 · DOI
- Wang Feng, 2010, Prudence and Pressure: Reproduction and Human Agency in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, 287
- 10.1080/0032472031000148736 · DOI
- 10.1515/9780804764681 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00133.x · DOI
- Wolf Arthur P., 1980, Marriage and Adoption in China: 1845–1945
- 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90054-9 · DOI
- Zimmerman David J., 1992, American Economic Review, 82, 409
Cited by
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, X., Campbell, C. D., & Lee, J. Z.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04-21
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 574-602
- ISSN
- 0003-1224
- 1939-8271
- PMC
- PMC4813328
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review