Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans

Nettle, Daniel, Pollet, Thomas V.·2008·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Although genomic studies suggest that natural selection in humans is ongoing, the strength of selection acting on particular characteristics in human populations has rarely been measured. Positive selection on male wealth appears to be a recurrent feature of human agrarian and pastoralist societies, and there is some evidence of it in industrial populations, too. Here we investigate the strength of selection on male wealth, first in contemporary Britain using data from the National Child Development Study and then across seven other varied human societies. The British data show positive selection on male income driven by increased childlessness among low-income men but a negative association between personal income and reproductive success for women. Across cultures, selection gradients for male wealth are weakest in industrial countries and strongest in subsistence societies with extensive polygyny. Even the weakest selection gradients observed for male wealth in humans are as strong as or stronger than selection gradients reported from field studies of other species. Thus, selection on male wealth in contemporary humans appears to be ubiquitous and substantial in strength.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/591690

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1162/qjec.121.3.999 · DOI
  2. 10.1525/aa.1987.89.3.02a00050 · DOI
  3. Borgerhoff Mulder M., 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 255
  4. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01357-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1257/089533002760278686 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s00148-003-0124-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0022050706000301 · DOI
  8. 10.1525/aa.1991.93.2.02a00040 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00050-U · DOI
  10. Endler J. A., Natural selection in the wild
  11. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.004 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/284924 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/19485565.2006.9989118 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.161281098 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004 · DOI
  16. Irons W., Cultural and biological success. Pages 257–272 in N
  17. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00559.x · DOI
  18. 10.1086/203235 · DOI
  19. Keizer R., 2007, Journal of Biosocial Science, 35, 213
  20. 10.1086/319193 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2095464 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00021-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90017-2 · DOI
  24. Nakosteen R. A., 1997, Social Science Quarterly, 78, 66
  25. 10.1348/000712603322503097 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S0140525X00029939 · DOI
  27. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0543 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.07.005 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0162-3095(92)90012-S · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s12110-004-1013-9 · DOI
  31. van den Berghe P. L., 1990, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 27, 29
  32. 10.1017/S0140525X00021968 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040446 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00174026 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.0509691102 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s12110-006-1001-3 · DOI

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2008-11
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
658-666
ISSN
  • 0003-0147
  • 1537-5323
Cited by
205
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/591690
The paper
Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V. (2008). Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/591690