Cited by 68Health disparities and outcomesHealth and Medical StudiesSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Utility of Health data from Social Surveys: Is There a Gold Standard for Measuring Morbidity?

Ferraro, Kenneth F., Farmer, Melissa M.·1999·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Most sociological and epidemiological studies of health status in adulthood rely on reports of morbidity from respondents to social surveys. This study compares self-reported morbidity with indicators of morbidity from physicians ‘ evaluations and examines the predictive validity of each indicator on self-assessed health and mortality in adulthood. Special attention is given to differences in the measures between white and African American adults. Adults from a large national survey received a detailed medical examination by a physician; they also were asked about the presence of 36 health conditions. Results indicate that self-reported morbidity is equal or superior to physician-evaluated morbidity in a prognostic sense. Both types of morbidity predict self-assessed health for white respondents, but physician-evaluated morbidity is not related to either self-assessed health or mortality for African American respondents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000312249906400212

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferraro, K. F., & Farmer, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1999-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
303-315
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W4385886501
Cited by
64
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
self-reported morbidity, health status measurement, predictive validity, mortality prediction, self-rated health, racial differences, African American adults, White adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review