The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence: A Reconsideration
Abstract
We reconsider the role of foreign investment in income inequality in light of recent critiques that question the results of quantitative cross-national research on foreign capital penetration. We analyze an unbalanced cross-national data set in which countries contribute different numbers of observations, with a maximum of 88 countries and 488 observations, dated from 1967 to 1994. Random-effects regression models that control for unmeasured country heterogeneity are used to investigate effects of foreign capital penetration on inequality (measured as the Gini coefficient) against the background of an internal-developmental model of inequality. We adapt Firebaugh's (1992, 1996) critique of the literature on the effect of foreign investment on economic growth to the study of income inequality and find that the stock of foreign direct investment has an effect on inequality that is independent of the mechanisms identified by Firebaugh. We explore Tsai's (1995) claim that the effect of foreign capital penetration is spurious and find that foreign stock has a significant positive effect on inequality net of region-specific differences. An alternative interpretation of the findings of the foreign investment/inequality literature is discussed in light of the discovery of an inverted-U shaped relationship between income inequality and foreign investment stock per capita. We conclude that thinking on the relationship between income inequality and investment dependence should be revised in light of an investment-development path relating the inflow and outflow of foreign capital to economic development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Cited by
Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries
Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/341329 · Cited by 759
Self-citationInequality: Causes and Consequences
Neckerman, K. M., & Torche, F. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131755 · Cited by 498
Greckhamer, T. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2370 · Cited by 403
Lim, A., & Tsutsui, K. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411432701 · Cited by 383
Inequality in the World Polity: The Structure of International Organization
Beckfield, J. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240306800305 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 606-631
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2002452055
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence: A Reconsideration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000312249906400409
- The paper
- Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (1999). Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence: A Reconsideration. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312249906400409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.