Cited by 6Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Dementia is Associated With Inferior Outcomes Following Emergency General Surgery

Verma, Arjun, Branche, Corynn, Chervu, Nikhil L., Sakowitz, Sara, Bakhtiyar, Syed Shahyan, Hadaya, Joseph, Benharash, Peyman·2023·The American Surgeon™

Abstract

Introduction: Given the steadily aging United States population, we used a national database to examine the association of dementia with clinical and financial outcomes following emergency general surgery. Methods: All adults undergoing non-elective appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small bowel resection, large bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, or lysis of adhesions were identified within the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Entropy balancing and multivariable regressions were used to assess the risk-adjusted association between dementia and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day unplanned readmissions. Results: Of an estimated 1,332,922 patients, 2.7% had dementia. Compared to those without, patients with dementia were older, more commonly male, and had a greater burden of chronic conditions. Following entropy balancing and multivariable risk-adjustment, dementia was associated with increased odds of mortality and sepsis across all operations except perforated ulcer repair. Dementia was also linked to greater likelihood of pneumonia across all operative categories. Moreover, dementia was associated with increased length of stay for patients in all operative categories except perforated ulcer repair, while costs were only increased for those undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and lysis of adhesions. Dementia was also linked to higher odds of non-home discharge following all operations, while non-elective readmissions were only increased for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Conclusions: The present study found dementia to be associated with a significant clinical and financial burden. Our findings may help inform shared decision making with patients and their families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00031348231175447

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verma, A., Branche, C., Chervu, N. L., Sakowitz, S., Bakhtiyar, S. S., Hadaya, J., & Benharash, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Benharash, Peyman
Venue
The American Surgeon™
Published
2023-05-03
Volume
89
Issue
10
Pages
3994-3999
ISSN
  • 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-9823
OpenAlex
W4367833881
Cited by
6
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Surgeon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
dementia, emergency general surgery, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, sepsis, pneumonia, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, unplanned hospital readmission, non-home discharge, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, adhesiolysis, shared decision-making
MeSH terms
Acute Care Surgery, Adult, Colectomy, Dementia, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Readmission, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Ulcer, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review