Cited by 833Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Natural history of sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Mattox, Douglas E., Simmons, F. Blair·1977·Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology

Abstract

This is a prospective in-depth study of patients with sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss. We found that 65% recover completely to functional hearing levels spontaneously and independent of any type of medical treatment. The majority do so within 14 days and many within the first few days. Prognosis can be predicted according to the slope of the initial audiogram (low-frequency losses do better than high-frequency losses), hearing at 8 kHz, erythrocyte sedimentation rates, in some select instances spatial disorientation symptoms, and speech discrimination scores. There was a very poor correlation between hearing and vestibular test abnormalities, except hypoactive calories. There were no correlations with age (excepting the very elderly), with antecedent respiratory infections, hypertension, diabetes, or other chronic diseases. We conclude that there is a fundamental difference in the behavior of apical and basal cochlea losses, that hearing recovery is always better at low than at high frequencies, that because of the high spontaneous recovery rates, tympanotomies seeking peri-lymph fistulas should be delayed ten days unless there is a progressive hearing loss, and that none of the current recommended treatments, especially histamine, have any effect on the outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000348947708600406

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattox, D. E., & Simmons, F. B.
Affiliations
Stanford, California
Venue
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Published
1977-07
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
463-480
ISSN
  • 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-572X
OpenAlex
W2070447196
Cited by
833
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sudden sensorineural hearing loss, idiopathic hearing loss, prognosis, low-frequency hearing loss, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, spatial disorientation, speech discrimination, vestibular dysfunction, caloric test, tympanotomy, histamine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Audiometry, Auditory Threshold, Blood Sedimentation, Child, Cochlea, Deafness, Ear Diseases, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Labyrinth Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Space Perception, Time Factors, Vascular Diseases, Virus Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review