Cited by 35Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Spontaneous recovery rate of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Chaushu, Hen, Ungar, Omer J., Abu Eta, Rani, Handzel, Ophir, Muhanna, Nidal, Oron, Yahav·2023·Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract

Purpose: Steroids comprise the mainstay of treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Since steroidal treatment was integrated to clinical practice guidelines, newly published no‐treatment or placebo arms in clinical trials are scarce. To evaluate the effectiveness of steroidal treatment ± hyperbaric oxygen therapy, the data should be compared to spontaneous recovery. The aim of this paper is to find the most accurate spontaneous recovery rate, in the light of which, other treatment modalities should be judged. Materials and Methods: Eligible studies published until July 2021 were identified through systematic searches of ‘PubMed’, ‘Web of Science’ and ‘Google Scholar’. Retrospective studies and randomised/non‐randomised control trials involving only adult participants (≥18 years) with ISSNHL, and placebo/no treatment were included. Only articles that used the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery's diagnostic criteria for ISSNHL were included. Results: 942 records initially identified, 166 duplicates and 753 articles were excluded based on article subject, title, and abstract. The full texts of 13 articles were reviewed. Seven studies were included for qualitative synthesis, five papers included in quantitative synthesis. 180 ears were included in pooled statistics. The pooled spontaneous recovery was 60.28% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.88%–79.94%) with a heterogeneity of 86.0% (95% CI = 69.4%–93.6%). Conclusions: Spontaneous recovery of ISSNHL should not be over‐looked, as it may be close to 60%. This may have both clinical and research implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/coa.14036

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2018, NIDCD Fact Sheet: Sudden Deafness

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaushu, H., Ungar, O. J., Abu Eta, R., Handzel, O., Muhanna, N., & Oron, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Corresponding author
  • Chaushu, Hen
  • Ungar, Omer J.
Venue
Clinical Otolaryngology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-22
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
395-402
ISSN
  • 0307-7772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4478
  • 1749-4486
OpenAlex
W4316174570
Cited by
35
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, spontaneous recovery, corticosteroid therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Steroids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review