The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cochlear Pathology in Presbycusis
Abstract
A survey of the temporal bone collection at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary reveals 21 cases that meet the criterion for the clinical diagnosis of presbycusis. It is evident that the previously advanced concept of four predominant pathologic types of presbycusis is valid, these being sensory, neural, strial, and cochlear conductive. An abrupt high-tone loss signals sensory presbycusis, a flat threshold pattern is indicative of strial presbycusis, and loss of word discrimination is characteristic of neural presbycusis. When the increments of threshold loss present a gradually decreasing linear distribution pattern on the audiometric scale and have no pathologic correlate, it is speculated that the hearing loss is caused by alterations in the physical characteristics of the cochlear duct, and the loss is identified as cochlear conductive presbycusis. It is clear that many individual cases do not separate into a specific type but have mixtures of these pathologic types and are termed mixed presbycusis. About 25% of all cases of presbycusis show none of the above characteristics and are classified as indeterminate presbycusis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wu, P.-Z., O'Malley, J. T., de Gruttola, V., & Liberman, M. C. (2020) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0937-20.2020 · Cited by 259
Aging and speech understanding
Lee, J. Y. (2015) · Journal of Audiology and Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.7 · Cited by 51
Weitzman, M. (2013) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3294 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuknecht, H. F., & Gacek, M. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 1_suppl
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-572X
- OpenAlex
- W2268695670
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cochlear Pathology in Presbycusis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00034894931020s101
- The paper
- Schuknecht, H. F., & Gacek, M. R. (1993). Cochlear Pathology in Presbycusis. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894931020s101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.