Maternal Prenatal Smoking and Hearing Loss Among Adolescents<alt-title>Prenatal Maternal Smoking and Later Hearing Loss</alt-title>
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Although smoking and secondhand smoke exposure are associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children and adults, the possible association between prenatal smoke exposure and hearing loss has not been investigated despite the fact that more than 12% of US children experience such prenatal exposure each year. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether exposure to prenatal tobacco smoke is independently associated with SNHL in adolescents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data were examined for 964 adolescents aged 12 to 15 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. PARTICIPANTS: Participants underwent standardized audiometric testing, and serum cotinine levels and self-reports were used to identify adolescents exposed to secondhand smoke or active smokers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prenatal exposure was defined as an affirmative parental response to, "Did [Sample Person's Name] biological mother smoke at any time while she was pregnant with [him/her]?" Sensorineural hearing loss was defined as an average pure-tone hearing level more than 15 dB for 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz (low frequency) and 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz (high frequency). RESULTS: Parental responses affirmed prenatal smoke exposure in 16.2% of 964 adolescents. Prenatal smoke exposure was associated with elevated pure-tone hearing thresholds at 2 and 6 kHz (P < .05), a higher rate of unilateral low-frequency SNHL (17.6% vs 7.1%; P < .05) in bivariate analyses, and a 2.6-fold increased odds of having unilateral low-frequency SNHL in multivariate analyses (95% CI, 1.1-6.4) after controlling for multiple hearing-related covariates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prenatal smoke exposure is independently associated with higher pure-tone hearing thresholds and an almost 3-fold increase in the odds of unilateral low-frequency hearing loss among adolescents. These novel findings suggest that in utero exposure to tobacco smoke may be injurious to the auditory system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An increased risk of low-frequency hearing loss has been documented in adolescent offspring of women who smoked during pregnancy.
“an increased risk of low-frequency hearing loss has been documented in adolescent offspring of women who smoked during pregnancy.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [145]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Fried, P. A., & Makin, J. E. (1987) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/0892-0362(87)90062-6 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Reading and language in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marijuana
Fried, P. A., Watkinson, B., & Siegel, L. S. (1997) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/s0892-0362(97)00015-9 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weitzman, M.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weitzman, Michael
- ORCID
- Weitzman, Michael
- Venue
- JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2013-06-20
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 2168-6181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1935938989
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Keywords
- prenatal tobacco exposure, smoking during pregnancy, sensorineural hearing loss, adolescents, low-frequency hearing loss, unilateral hearing loss, pure-tone thresholds, serum cotinine, auditory development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Cotinine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review