The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting qualitative research in mental health: Thematic and content analyses
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe two methods of qualitative analysis – thematic analysis and content analysis – and to examine their use in a mental health context. Method: A description of the processes of thematic analysis and content analysis is provided. These processes are then illustrated by conducting two analyses of the same qualitative data. Transcripts of qualitative interviews are analysed using each method to illustrate these processes. Results: The illustration of the processes highlights the different outcomes from the same set of data. Conclusion: Thematic and content analyses are qualitative methods that serve different research purposes. Thematic analysis provides an interpretation of participants’ meanings, while content analysis is a direct representation of participants’ responses. These methods provide two ways of understanding meanings and experiences and provide important knowledge in a mental health context.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alternatively, the present study employs an inductive approach, allowing patterns and key ideas to be derived from the responses [33,34,35,36].”
From Voices of the Pacific: Pacific Peoples’ Conceptualisations of Anxiety in Aotearoa New Zealand—Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“CA is a systematic approach for identifying and analysing patterns in qualitative and quantitative research, and is widely used in healthcare, social and community psychological research [33,34,35,36].”
From Voices of the Pacific: Pacific Peoples’ Conceptualisations of Anxiety in Aotearoa New Zealand—Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · Cited by 20,772
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x · Cited by 2,311
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.4135/9781849209731.n1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00526.x · DOI
- Boyd C, 2011, Rural and Remote Health, 11
- 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00780.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01673.x · DOI
- 10.1177/070674370805300303 · DOI
- Denzin N, 2003, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
- 10.3109/09638237.2014.880408 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11126-010-9125-3 · DOI
- Joffe H, 2004, Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, 56
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x · DOI
- Krippendorf K (2013) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- 10.1111/jpm.12053 · DOI
- 10.1111/inm.12063 · DOI
- QSR International, 2007, NVivo 8
- 10.1111/nhs.12048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01319.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research
Jorm, A. F. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415600891 · Cited by 765
Chevance, A., Ravaud, P., Tomlinson, A., Le Berre, C., Teufer, B., Touboul, S., Fried, E. I., Gartlehner, G., Cipriani, A., & Tran, V. T. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30191-7 · Cited by 193
Hennessy, B., Hunter, A., & Grealish, A. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12889 · Cited by 61
Views of psycho-oncologists, physicians, and nurses on cancer care—A qualitative study
Steven, B., Lange, L., Schulz, H., & Bleich, C. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210325 · Cited by 45
DellaCrosse, M., Pleet, M., Morton, E., Ashtari, A., Sakai, K., Woolley, J., & Michalak, E. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279073 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowe, M., Inder, M., & Porter, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04-21
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 616-623
- ISSN
- 0004-8674
- 1440-1614
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review