The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Corporate Reputation: Definition and Data
Abstract
By examining existing definitions and data sets, this article explores the current state of efforts intended to measure corporate reputation. Both definitions and data are found to be lacking, and it is argued that many deficiencies in definition and data can be attributed to the fact that theory development related to corporate reputation has been insufficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barnett, M. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520 · Cited by 2,060
Organizational Reputation: A Review
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310390963 · Cited by 960
Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation
Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0015-7 · Cited by 899
A Corporate Social Performance–Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318916 · Cited by 493
Consumer trust in tourism and hospitality: A review of the literature
Wang, L., Law, R., Hung, K., & Guillet, B. D. (2014) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2014.01.001 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Wartick, S. L.
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-392
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W2043099389
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
