Revisiting the do-live-well health promotion framework: A citation content analysis

May combine two claims.

The eight dimensions of experience and five activity patterns were the most noted parts of the framework, providing the language to explain study findings.

“In particular, the eight dimensions of experience and five activity patterns were the most noted parts of the framework, providing the language to explain study findings.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Four of the citations were published in French and two were in German.

“Four of the citations were published in French and two were in German.”

May combine two claims.

DLW has been most frequently applied as a theoretical framework in the context of qualitative research, although it has also been used to inform clinical practice.

“A combination of peer-reviewed articles, theses, and dissertations revealed that DLW has been most frequently applied as a theoretical framework in the context of qualitative research, although it has also been used to inform clinical practice.”

May combine two claims.

Within the 17 citations, nine were from Canada, three from the United States, and one each from France, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland, and Germany.

“Within these 17 citations, nine were from Canada, three from the United States, and one each from France, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland, and Germany.”

May combine two claims.

To date, most of the publications applying DLW have been in Canada or the United States, with the remaining publications from Western European countries (France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, and Switzerland).

“However, to date, most of the publications applying DLW have been in Canada or the United States, with the remaining publications from Western European countries (France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden, and Switzerland).”

May combine two claims.

From a clinical practice perspective, the framework has been used to inform a range of clinical interventions, from an individual reflective tool on activity patterns to a structured chatbot for an app and various group-based self-management interventions.

“From a clinical practice perspective, the framework has been used to inform a range of clinical interventions, from an individual reflective tool on activity patterns (Woick, 2018), to a structured chatbot for an app (Liu, 2021) and various group-based self-management interventions (Hunt & Coombes, 2021; Hutchinson et al., 2017).”

• cites Woick, 2018Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

• cites Liu, 2021Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

• cites Hunt & Coombes, 2021Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

May combine two claims.

To date, much of the literature has been authored by occupational therapists and/or published in occupational therapy journals.

“To date, much of the literature has been authored by occupational therapists and/or published in occupational therapy journals.”

May combine two claims.

Five additional citations used DLW in a more general way, including the theoretical justification for the study and discussion of results in relation to DLW, but DLW did not explicitly inform data collection methods or analysis.

“Five additional citations used DLW in a more general way, including the theoretical justification for the study and discussion of results in relation to DLW, but DLW did not explicitly inform data collection methods or analysis.”

May combine two claims.

DLW is a Canadian health promotion framework based on public health and occupational therapy principles.

“First published in 2015, the Do-Live-Well (DLW) or Vivez-Bien-Votre Vie framework is a Canadian health promotion framework based on public health and occupational therapy principles (Moll et al., 2015).”

• cites Moll et al., 2015Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Citation analysis is only a first step in understanding the uptake of DLW as it can only trace the usage of the framework that is documented in published sources.

“However, citation analysis is only a first step in understanding the uptake of DLW as it can only trace the usage of the framework that is documented in published sources.”

May combine two claims.

Publications outside of occupational therapy are evident (e.g., BMJ Open, Leisure & Society), which speaks to relevance for a broader audience.

“Publications outside of occupational therapy are evident (e.g., BMJ Open, Leisure & Society), which speaks to relevance for a broader audience, although occupational therapy authors appear to be the driving force in creating and disseminating the evidence.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

DLW was designed as a health promotion framework to generate reflection and discussion on the impact of everyday activities on health and well-being at individual, community, and national levels.

“DLW was designed as a health promotion framework to generate reflection and discussion on the impact of everyday activities on health and well-being at individual, community, and national levels (Moll et al., 2015).”

• cites Moll et al., 2015Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Information about DLW was published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 2016.

“Database searches were used to track citations of two seminal publications that presented DLW, including the original 2015 framework paper published in the Canadian occupational therapy literature (Moll et al., 2015) and the 2016 opinion paper published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health (Gewurtz et al., 2016).”

• cites Gewurtz et al., 2016Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

Since the citation analysis was limited to articles and theses available in empirical databases, there are likely clinicians and communities using DLW in other ways that are not as easily identifiable.

“Since the citation analysis was limited to articles and theses available in empirical databases, it should be noted that there are likely clinicians and communities using DLW in other ways that are not as easily identifiable.”

May combine two claims.

Although occupational therapy is currently the main field using DLW, the citation analysis confirms the diversity and broad application of the framework with both clinical and general populations in a variety of settings.

“Although occupational therapy is currently the main field using DLW, the citation analysis confirms the diversity and broad application of the framework with both clinical and general populations in a variety of settings.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The authors of the framework were Canadian, white settlers and as such, the framework likely reflects Western cultural norms and values surrounding activity patterns and time use.

“It should be noted that the authors of the framework were Canadian, white settlers and as such, the framework likely reflects Western Cultural norms and values surrounding activity patterns and time use.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The authors of the DLW framework were Canadian, white settlers.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

The DLW framework articulates key concepts that are often overlooked, and insights regarding the evidence-based links between occupation, health, and well-being of individuals and communities can inform health promotion policy and practice.

“The framework articulates key concepts that are often overlooked, and insights regarding the evidence-based links between occupation, health, and well-being of individuals and communities can inform health promotion policy and practice (Reitz & Scaffa, 2020).”

• cites Reitz & Scaffa, 2020Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Citation content analysis is a widely used and accepted way to assess the impact of scholarly work.

“A citation content analysis was chosen as it is a widely used and accepted way to assess the impact of scholarly work (Zhang et al., 2013).”

• cites Zhang et al., 2013Not checked yet

  Not checked in the free run.